ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2021
Age and aging effects on blood pressure: 15 years follow-up of Tehran lipid and glucose study.
Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between ambient temperature and blood pressure in hypertensive adults in Bogor City, Indonesia: a 6-year longitudinal cohort study.Osong public health and research perspectives · 2026Article
- Parity and hypertension risk in couples: does number of parity matter: findings from Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Age and aging effects on blood pressure: 15 years follow-up of Tehran lipid and glucose study.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2021Article
- Salivary Calcium Level and Its Correlation with Salivary pH, Salivary Volume, and Calcium Intake in Hypertensive Female Patients with Different Blood Sugar Levels.Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Age is a known predictor of blood pressure (BP); however, the literature mostly includes cross-sectional investigations. This prospective cohort study aimed to decompose the cross-sectional and longitudinal age effects on BP. The secondary data were obtained from the Tehran lipid and glucose study, which comprised six repeated measurements of participants, with median follow-up of 15.8 (interquartile range of 14.2-16.9) years. The sample is representative of the metropolitan area of Tehran, Iran, containing 7,460 participants aged 20-70. The cross-sectional and longitudinal effects of age (age at baseline and aging, respectively) were fitted in the mixed effects models, taking systolic, diastolic, and pulse BPs as response, adjusting for adiposity, smoking, diabetes, and antihypertensive medication, and stratifying for sex and 10-year age-groups. The mean age at baseline was 41.3 (SD = 12.9) years, and 41.7% of the participants were male. Age at baseline and aging were directly associated with BP, aging owned the weaker effect, and the largest distinction were for systolic blood pressure of men aged 40-49 years (0.75 vs 0.10, p-value < .001). Moreover, the aging effects on systolic and diastolic BPs were higher in men than women, in the age groups 40-49 and 30-39 years (0.35 vs 0.10 and 0.30 vs 0.07, p-values < .001), respectively. Adjusting for adiposity remarkably declined the impact of aging on BP, among the < 50 years old.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.