Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33720371›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Association of Clinical, Biological, and Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings With Electroencephalographic Findings for Patients With COVID-19.

Virginie Lambrecq, Aurélie Hanin, Esteban Munoz-Musat, Lydia Chougar, Salimata Gassama, Cécile Delorme, Louis Cousyn, Alaina Borden, Maria Damiano, Valerio Frazzini and 20 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05303116 (COVID19 Effects on the Brain and Cerebral Function; Do Quantitative Measures of Brain Electrical Activity Along With Neurocognitive Assessments Correlate With Symptoms and Clinical Assessment?), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05303116 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

COVID19 Effects on the Brain and Cerebral Function; Do Quantitative Measures of Brain Electrical Activity Along With Neurocognitive Assessments Correlate With Symptoms and Clinical Assessment?

TypeobservationalSponsorTexas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El PasoRan2022 to 2024Enrolled55ConditionsCOVID-19ArmsBrainscope modified EEG and cognitive testing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Cognitive impairment or dementia in post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Two suspects and a perfect detective: Positron emission tomography (PET) scan.European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Virginie LambrecqSorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute, Institut du Cerveau, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U 1127, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7225, Paris, France.
Aurélie HaninSorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute, Institut du Cerveau, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U 1127, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7225, Paris, France.
Esteban Munoz-MusatSorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute, Institut du Cerveau, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U 1127, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7225, Paris, France.
Lydia ChougarSorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute, Institut du Cerveau, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U 1127, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7225, Paris, France.
Salimata GassamaAssistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Neurology Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Cécile DelormeAssistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Neurology Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Louis CousynSorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute, Institut du Cerveau, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U 1127, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7225, Paris, France.
Alaina BordenAssistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Clinical Neurophysiology Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Maria DamianoAssistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Clinical Neurophysiology Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Valerio FrazziniSorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute, Institut du Cerveau, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U 1127, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7225, Paris, France.
Gilles HuberfeldAssistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Clinical Neurophysiology Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Frank LandgrafAssistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Clinical Neurophysiology Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Vi-Huong Nguyen-MichelAssistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Clinical Neurophysiology Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Phintip PichitAssistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Clinical Neurophysiology Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Aude SangareSorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute, Institut du Cerveau, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U 1127, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7225, Paris, France.
Mario ChavezSorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute, Institut du Cerveau, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U 1127, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7225, Paris, France.
Capucine Morélot-PanziniService de Pneumologie, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Elise MorawiecService de Pneumologie, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Mathieu RauxSorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute, Institut du Cerveau, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U 1127, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7225, Paris, France.
Charles-Edouard LuytInstitut de Cardiologie, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Pierre RufatAssistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Biostatistic Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Damien GalanaudSorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute, Institut du Cerveau, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U 1127, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7225, Paris, France.
Jean-Christophe CorvolSorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute, Institut du Cerveau, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U 1127, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7225, Paris, France.
Catherine LubetzkiSorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute, Institut du Cerveau, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U 1127, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7225, Paris, France.
Benjamin RohautSorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute, Institut du Cerveau, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U 1127, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7225, Paris, France.
Sophie DemeretAssistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Neurology Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Nadya PyatigorskayaSorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute, Institut du Cerveau, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U 1127, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7225, Paris, France.
Lionel NaccacheSorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute, Institut du Cerveau, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U 1127, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7225, Paris, France.
Vincent NavarroSorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute, Institut du Cerveau, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U 1127, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7225, Paris, France.
Cohort COVID-19 Neurosciences (CoCo Neurosciences) Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: There is evidence of central nervous system impairments associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection, including encephalopathy. Multimodal monitoring of patients with COVID-19 may delineate the specific features of COVID-19-related encephalopathy and guide clinical management. Objectives: To investigate clinical, biological, and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in association with electroencephalographic (EEG) features for patients with COVID-19, and to better refine the features of COVID-19-related encephalopathy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study conducted in Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France, enrolled 78 hospitalized adults who received a diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov2) and underwent EEG between March 30 and June 11, 2020. Exposures: Detection of SARS-CoV-2 from a nasopharyngeal specimen using a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay or, in the case of associated pneumonia, on a computed tomography scan of the chest. Main Outcomes and Measures: Data on the clinical and paraclinical features of the 78 patients with COVID-19 were retrieved from electronic patient records. Results: Of 644 patients who were hospitalized for COVID-19, 78 (57 men [73%]; mean [SD] age, 61 [12] years) underwent EEG. The main indications for EEG were delirium, seizure-like events, and delayed awakening in the intensive care unit after stopping treatment with sedatives. Sixty-nine patients showed pathologic EEG findings, including metabolic-toxic encephalopathy features, frontal abnormalities, periodic discharges, and epileptic activities. Of 57 patients who underwent brain MRI, 41 showed abnormalities, including perfusion abnormalities, acute ischemic lesions, multiple microhemorrhages, and white matter-enhancing lesions. Fifty-five patients showed biological abnormalities, including dysnatremia, kidney failure, and liver dysfunction, the same day as the EEG. The results of cerebrospinal fluid analysis were negative for SARS-Cov-2 for all tested patients. Nine patients who had no identifiable cause of brain injury outside COVID-19 were further isolated; their brain injury was defined as COVID-19-related encephalopathy. They represented 1% (9 of 644) of patients with COVID-19 requiring hospitalization. Six of these 9 patients had movement disorders, 7 had frontal syndrome, 4 had brainstem impairment, 4 had periodic EEG discharges, and 3 had MRI white matter-enhancing lesions. Conclusions and Relevance: The results from this cohort of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 suggest there are clinical, EEG, and MRI patterns that could delineate specific COVID-19-related encephalopathy and guide treatment strategy.

Indexed as

SARS-CoV-2Brain DiseasesCohort StudiesCOVID-19ElectroencephalographyElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID33720371
PMCPMC7961310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.