Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33720369›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Association Between Contact Precautions and Transmission of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Veterans Affairs Hospitals.

Karim Khader, Alun Thomas, Vanessa Stevens, Lindsay Visnovsky, McKenna Nevers, Damon Toth, Lindsay T Keegan, Makoto Jones, Michael Rubin, Matthew H Samore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  2. Estimating Changes in Facility Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Infection Rates Due to Changes in MRSA Precaution Policy.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Modeling transmission of pathogens in healthcare settings.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Karim KhaderIDEAS Center of Innovation, Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Alun ThomasDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Vanessa StevensIDEAS Center of Innovation, Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Lindsay VisnovskyIDEAS Center of Innovation, Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah.
McKenna NeversIDEAS Center of Innovation, Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Damon TothIDEAS Center of Innovation, Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Lindsay T KeeganIDEAS Center of Innovation, Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Makoto JonesIDEAS Center of Innovation, Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Michael RubinIDEAS Center of Innovation, Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Matthew H SamoreIDEAS Center of Innovation, Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Funding

Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR002538 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HESS, RACHEL, MAJERSIK, JENNIFER JUHL · 2018 to 2022
$26.0M
Actionable Knowledge to Guide Antibiotic StewardshipIK2HX001165 · VA · VA SALT LAKE CITY HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI JONES, MAKOTO · 2015 to 2020
–
HSRD VA IK2 HX001165NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002538NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The effectiveness and importance of contact precautions for endemic pathogens has long been debated, and their use has broad implications for infection control of other pathogens. Objective: To estimate the association between contact precautions and transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) across US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used mathematical models applied to data from a population-based sample of adults hospitalized in 108 VA acute care hospitals for at least 24 hours from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2017. Data were analyzed from May 2, 2019, to December 11, 2020. Exposures: A positive MRSA test result, presumed to indicate contact precautions use according to the VA MRSA Prevention Initiative. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was the association between contact precautions and MRSA transmission, defined as the relative transmissibility attributed to contact precautions. A contact precaution effect estimate (<1 indicates a reduction in transmission associated with contact precautions) was estimated for each hospital and then pooled over time and across hospitals using meta-regression. Results: In this cohort study of 108 VA hospitals, more than 2 million unique individuals had over 5.6 million admissions, of which 14.1% were presumed to have contact precautions with more than 8.4 million MRSA surveillance tests. Pooled estimates found associations between contact precautions and transmission to be stable from 2008 to 2017, with estimated transmission reductions ranging from 43% (95% credible interval [CrI], 38%-48%) to 51% (95% CrI, 46%-55%). Over the entire 10-year study period, contact precautions reduced transmission 47% (95% CrI, 45%-49%), and the intrafacility autocorrelation coefficient estimate was 0.99, suggesting consistent estimates over time within facilities. Larger facilities and those with higher admission screening compliance observed additional reductions in transmission associated with contact precautions (relative rate, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74-0.96 and 0.74; 95% CI, 0.58-0.96, respectively) compared with smaller facilities and those with lower admission screening compliance. Facilities in the southern US had a smaller transmission reduction attributable to contact precautions (relative rate, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.01-1.28) compared with facilities in other regions in the US. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of adults in VA hospitals, transmissibility of MRSA was found to be reduced by approximately 50% among patients with contact precautions. These results provide an explanation for decreasing acquisition rates in VA hospitals since the MRSA Prevention Initiative.

Indexed as

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusCohort StudiesCross InfectionHospitals, VeteransHumansInfection ControlRetrospective StudiesStaphylococcal InfectionsUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs

Identifiers

PMID33720369
PMCPMC7961311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.