Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33720350›Full record

Trial reportClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2021

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing Tedizolid Phosphate and Linezolid for Treatment of Ventilated Gram-Positive Hospital-Acquired or Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia.

Richard G Wunderink, Antoine Roquilly, Martin Croce, Daniel Rodriguez Gonzalez, Satoshi Fujimi, Joan R Butterton, Natasha Broyde, Myra W Popejoy, Jason Y Kim, Carisa De Anda

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02019420 (A Phase 3 Randomized Double-blind Study Comparing TR-701 FA and Linezolid in Ventilated Gram-positive Nosocomial Pneumonia), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02019420 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3 Randomized Double-blind Study Comparing TR-701 FA and Linezolid in Ventilated Gram-positive Nosocomial Pneumonia

TypeinterventionalSponsorCubist Pharmaceuticals LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA)Ran2014 to 2018Enrolled726ConditionsPneumoniaArmsTedizolid phosphate, Linezolid
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Guidelines for Antibiotics Prescription in Critically Ill Patients.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Tedizolid: new data and experiences for clinical practice.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Richard G WunderinkDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Antoine RoquillyUniversité de Nantes, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, EA3826 Thérapeutiques Anti-Infectieuses, Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation Chirurgicale, Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, F-44000.
Martin CroceRegional One Health, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Daniel Rodriguez GonzalezDepartment of Intensive Care, Nuevo Hospital Civil de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.
Satoshi FujimiDepartment of Trauma, Critical Care, and Emergency Medicine, Osaka General Medical Center, Sumiyoshi-ku, Osaka, Japan.
Joan R ButtertonMerck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Natasha BroydeMerck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Myra W PopejoyMerck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Jason Y KimMerck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Carisa De AndaMerck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRHospital Civil de Guadalajara · MXNorthwestern University · USOsaka Prefectural Medical Center · JPRegional Medical Center · US

Funding

Technology CoreU19AI135964 · NIAID · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI LUIS A. Nunes AMARAL · 2018 to 2026
$24.7M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI135964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) are associated with high mortality rates. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of tedizolid (administered as tedizolid phosphate) for treatment of gram-positive ventilated HABP/VABP.

methodsIn this randomized, noninferiority, double-blind, double-dummy, global phase 3 trial, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive intravenous tedizolid phosphate 200 mg once daily for 7 days or intravenous linezolid 600 mg every 12 hours for 10 days. Treatment was 14 days in patients with concurrent gram-positive bacteremia. The primary efficacy end points were day 28 all-cause mortality (ACM; noninferiority margin, 10%) and investigator-assessed clinical response at test of cure (TOC; noninferiority margin, 12.5%) in the intention-to-treat population.

resultsOverall, 726 patients were randomized (tedizolid, n = 366; linezolid, n = 360). Baseline characteristics, including incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (31.3% overall), were well balanced. Tedizolid was noninferior to linezolid for day 28 ACM rate: 28.1% and 26.4%, respectively (difference, -1.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -8.2 to 4.7). Noninferiority of tedizolid was not demonstrated for investigator-assessed clinical cure at TOC (tedizolid, 56.3% vs linezolid, 63.9%; difference, -7.6%; 97.5% CI: -15.7 to 0.5). In post hoc analyses, no single factor accounted for the difference in clinical response between treatment groups. Drug-related adverse events occurred in 8.1% and 11.9% of patients who received tedizolid and linezolid, respectively.

conclusionsTedizolid was noninferior to linezolid for day 28 ACM in the treatment of gram-positive ventilated HABP/VABP. Noninferiority of tedizolid for investigator-assessed clinical response at TOC was not demonstrated. Both drugs were well tolerated. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02019420.

Indexed as

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusPneumonia, BacterialSkin Diseases, BacterialAnti-Bacterial AgentsDouble-Blind MethodHospitalsHumansLinezolidOrganophosphatesOxazolesVentilators, MechanicalAnti-Bacterial AgentsLinezolidOrganophosphatesOxazolestedizolid phosphategram-positive coccihealthcare-associated bacterial pneumoniaStaphylococcal infectionsventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID33720350
PMCPMC8326538
OpenAlexW3137711194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.