ArticleGenetics2021
Robust, flexible, and scalable tests for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium across diverse ancestries.
Article in Genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in T2T-aligned 1000 genomes project.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Whole genome sequencing analysis of over 3500 individuals dementia-free over 85 years old.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2026Article
- Application of the STAAR framework in detecting rare variant associations with Alzheimer disease and related dementias: Insights and implications.HGG advances · 2026Article
- Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium Filtering in Population Genomics: Empirical Review and Decision Framework for Improved Practice.Ecology and evolution · 2026Review
- Circulating Proteomic Profiles Are Associated With Incident Type 2 Diabetes in Asian Populations.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Article
- Nuclear regulatory disturbances precede and predict the development of Type-2 diabetes in Asian populations.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Gene-based Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test using genotype count data: application to six types of cancers.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Association of common and rare variants with Alzheimer's disease in more than 13,000 diverse individuals with whole-genome sequencing from the Alzheimer's Disease Sequencing Project.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Article
- Semi-supervised machine learning method for predicting homogeneous ancestry groups to assess Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in diverse whole-genome sequencing studies.American journal of human genetics · 2024Article
- Integrated clinical risk prediction of type 2 diabetes with a multifactorial polygenic risk score.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Efficient test for deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium with known or ambiguous typing in highly polymorphic loci.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium in Meta-Analysis Studies and Large-Scale Genomic Sequencing Era.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Review
- eXclusionarY: 10 years later, where are the sex chromosomes in GWASs?American journal of human genetics · 2023Review
- FixItFelix: improving genomic analysis by fixing reference errors.Genome biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
48 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) tests (the χ2 test and the exact test) have long been used as a metric for evaluating genotype quality, as technical artifacts leading to incorrect genotype calls often can be identified as deviations from HWE. However, in data sets composed of individuals from diverse ancestries, HWE can be violated even without genotyping error, complicating the use of HWE testing to assess genotype data quality. In this manuscript, we present the Robust Unified Test for HWE (RUTH) to test for HWE while accounting for population structure and genotype uncertainty, and to evaluate the impact of population heterogeneity and genotype uncertainty on the standard HWE tests and alternative methods using simulated and real sequence data sets. Our results demonstrate that ignoring population structure or genotype uncertainty in HWE tests can inflate false-positive rates by many orders of magnitude. Our evaluations demonstrate different tradeoffs between false positives and statistical power across the methods, with RUTH consistently among the best across all evaluations. RUTH is implemented as a practical and scalable software tool to rapidly perform HWE tests across millions of markers and hundreds of thousands of individuals while supporting standard VCF/BCF formats. RUTH is publicly available at https://www.github.com/statgen/ruth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.