Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33720345›Full record

ReviewEmerging topics in life sciences2021

Plant pest surveillance: from satellites to molecules.

Gonçalo Silva, Jenny Tomlinson, Nawaporn Onkokesung, Sarah Sommer, Latifa Mrisho, James Legg, Ian P Adams, Yaiza Gutierrez-Vazquez, Thomas P Howard, Alex Laverick and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Emerging topics in life sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Digital plant pathology: a foundation and guide to modern agriculture.Journal of plant diseases and protection : scientific journal of the German Phytomedical Society (DPG) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Gonçalo SilvaNatural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, U.K.
Jenny TomlinsonFera Science Ltd., York Biotech Campus, Sand Hutton, York YO41 1LZ, U.K.
Nawaporn OnkokesungSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Agriculture Building, Newcastle University, King's Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, U.K.
Sarah SommerSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Agriculture Building, Newcastle University, King's Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, U.K.
Latifa MrishoInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Dar el Salaam, Tanzania.
James LeggInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Dar el Salaam, Tanzania.
Ian P AdamsFera Science Ltd., York Biotech Campus, Sand Hutton, York YO41 1LZ, U.K.
Yaiza Gutierrez-VazquezFera Science Ltd., York Biotech Campus, Sand Hutton, York YO41 1LZ, U.K.
Thomas P HowardSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Agriculture Building, Newcastle University, King's Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, U.K.
Alex LaverickSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Agriculture Building, Newcastle University, King's Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, U.K.
Oindrila HossainDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, U.S.A.
Qingshan WeiDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, U.S.A.
Kaitlin M GoldPlant Pathology and Plant Microbe Biology Section, Cornell University, 15 Castle Creek Drive, Geneva, NY 14456, U.S.A.
Neil BoonhamSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Agriculture Building, Newcastle University, King's Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-8886-5708
Newcastle University · GBFera Science (United Kingdom) · GBInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture · TZNorth Carolina State University · USCornell University · USNatural Resources Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant pests and diseases impact both food security and natural ecosystems, and the impact has been accelerated in recent years due to several confounding factors. The globalisation of trade has moved pests out of natural ranges, creating damaging epidemics in new regions. Climate change has extended the range of pests and the pathogens they vector. Resistance to agrochemicals has made pathogens, pests, and weeds more difficult to control. Early detection is critical to achieve effective control, both from a biosecurity as well as an endemic pest perspective. Molecular diagnostics has revolutionised our ability to identify pests and diseases over the past two decades, but more recent technological innovations are enabling us to achieve better pest surveillance. In this review, we will explore the different technologies that are enabling this advancing capability and discuss the drivers that will shape its future deployment.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeEcosystemPlant Weedsbiosecuritydiagnosticsphytopathologysurveillance

Identifiers

PMID33720345
PMCPMC8166340
OpenAlexW3136962826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.