Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33719600›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie2021

Segmenting or Summing the Parts? A Scoping Review of Male Suicide Research in Canada.

John L Oliffe, Mary T Kelly, Gabriela Gonzalez Montaner, Paul S Links, David Kealy, John S Ogrodniczuk

Open access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Create Solidarity Networks: Dialogs in Reddit to Overcome Depression and Suicidal Ideation among Males.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

John L Oliffe70439School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9029-4003
Mary T Kelly70439School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Gabriela Gonzalez Montaner70439School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Paul S Links153002Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences at McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
David Kealy175098Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
John S Ogrodniczuk175098Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CAMcMaster University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSuicide in Canadian men is high and rising. Research consistently indicates increased suicide risk in male subgroups including sexual minority, Indigenous, middle-aged, and military men. The current scoping review addresses the research question: Among male subgroups featured in Canadian suicide research, what are the key findings to inform suicide prevention efforts?.

methodA scoping review was undertaken in accord with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Structured searches were conducted in CIHAHL, Medline, PsychInfo, and Web of Science to identify studies reporting suicidality (suicidal ideation, plans and/or attempts) and suicide among men in Canada. Inclusion criteria comprised primary empirical studies featuring Canadian male subgroups published in English from 2009 to 2020 inclusive.

resultsSixty-eight articles met the inclusion criteria, highlighting significant rates of male suicidality and/or suicide in 3 categories: (1) health inequities (

conclusionWhile male subgroups who are vulnerable to suicidality and suicide were consistently described, these insights have not translated to tailored upstream suicide prevention services for Canadian boys and men. There may be some important gains through integrating social and mental health care services for marginalized men, implementing school-based masculinity programs for adolescent males, orientating clinicians to the potential for men's mid-life suicide risks (i.e., separation, bereavement, retirement) and lobbying employers to norm help-seeking among activate military, veterans, and first responder males.

Indexed as

Men's HealthSuicide PreventionAdolescentAgedCanadaFemaleHumansMaleMasculinityMiddle AgedSuicidal Ideationadolescent male suicidemale suicidemen’s health inequitiesmen’s suicidalitysuicide preventionveterans mental health

Identifiers

PMID33719600
PMCPMC8107953
OpenAlexW3138974399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.