Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33719467›Full record

ArticlePsychological assessment2021

Multiple informant average integration of ADHD symptom ratings predictive of concurrent and longitudinal impairment.

Michelle M Martel, Ashley G Eng, Pevitr S Bansal, Tess E Smith, Anjeli R Elkins, Patrick K Goh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological assessment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Multi-Informant Ratings of Childhood Limited Prosocial Emotions: Mother, Father, and Teacher Perspectives.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michelle M MartelPsychology Department.
Ashley G EngPsychology Department.ORCID 0000-0002-2396-7594
Pevitr S BansalPsychology Department.ORCID 0000-0001-7340-4215
Tess E SmithPsychology Department.
Anjeli R ElkinsPsychology Department.
Patrick K GohPsychology Department.ORCID 0000-0002-5454-4885

Funding

Estrogen Effects on ADHD and CognitionR01MH119119 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI MARTEL, MICHELLE M · 2019 to 2023
$3.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH119119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, there remains no consensus about the best evidence-based method for integrating multiple informant data in the diagnosis of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Several approaches exist, including the psychometrically sound approach of averaging scores, as well as the use of "OR" and "AND" algorithms, which are still commonly used in research. The current study tested these major integration methods in their concurrent and longitudinal prediction of clinician-rated impairment, teacher-rated academic, and parent- and self-rated social skill ratings in children overrecruited for ADHD across a 6-year span from childhood to adolescence. The sample included a total of 800 children, 480 with ADHD, ages 6 to 13, who completed a "gold standard" assessment of ADHD and associated impairment. Overall, the "OR," "AND," and average integration approaches showed significantly high interrelations with one another (

Indexed as

AlgorithmsParentsSchool TeachersAdolescentAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityChildDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePsychometricsSensitivity and SpecificitySymptom Assessment

Identifiers

PMID33719467
PMCPMC8366592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.