ArticleHLA2021
Standard reference sequences for submission of HLA genotyping for the 18th International HLA and Immunogenetics Workshop.
Article in HLA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Classical HLA allele and haplotype frequency estimates in US populations.Human immunology · 2026Article
- Classical HLA Allele and Haplotype Frequency Estimates in US Populations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Recommendations for HLA Genotyping Data Standards and Clinical Laboratory Staffing Considerations.HLA · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- Snowflake: A deep learning-based human leukocyte antigen matching algorithm considering allele-specific surface accessibility.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Challenges for the standardized reporting of NGS HLA genotyping: Surveying gaps between clinical and research laboratories.Human immunology · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The International human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and Immunogenetics Workshops (IHIWs) have fostered international collaborations of researchers and experts in the fields of HLA, histocompatibility and immunology. These IHIW collaborations have comprised many projects focused on achieving a variety of specific goals. The international and collaborative nature of these projects necessitates the collection and analysis of complex data generated in multiple laboratories, often using multiple methods of acquisition. Collection and storage of these data in a consistent way adds value to IHIW projects, which can be extended to future work. DNA-based genotyping data, especially HLA genotyping data, can be transmitted in the form of a Histoimmunogenetics Markup Language (HML) document. HML facilitates clear communication of a genotype and supporting metadata, such as, sequencing platform, laboratory assays, consensus sequence, and interpretation. Sequence information can be reported relative to known reference sequences, which add meaning and context to genotypes. Selecting the correct reference sequence for a given allele sequence is nuanced, and guidelines have emerged through collaborative community efforts such as Data Standards Hackathons. Here, we describe the guidelines established for the selection of reference sequences to be used in transmission of HLA (and MICA/MICB) genotyping data for the 18th IHIW.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.