Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33719209›Full record

ArticleESC heart failure2021

Self-care perception and behaviour in patients with heart failure: A qualitative and quantitative study.

Natasa Sedlar, Mitja Lainscak, Jerneja Farkas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESC heart failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Symptom Management in Chronic Heart Failure: Strategies and Behaviours From Patients' Perspectives-A Scoping Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natasa SedlarNational Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Mitja LainscakFaculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Jerneja FarkasNational Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
National Institute of Public Health · SIPomurski muzej Murska Sobota · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveSelf-care strategies in heart failure (HF) are effective for disease management, yet adherence in many patients is inadequate. Reasons are presumably multifactorial but remain insufficiently investigated; thus, we aimed to analyse self-care adherence and associated factors in outpatients with HF. METHODS AND

resultsTo measure self-care levels and explore barriers and facilitators to self-care adherence in patients with HF, quantitative study using the European Self-Care Behaviour Scale (EHFScBS-9) (n = 80; NYHA II-III, mean age 72 ± 10 years, 58% male) and qualitative study using semi-structured interviews (n = 32; NYHA II-III, mean age 73 ± 11, 63% male) were conducted. We detected lowest adherence to regular exercise (39%) and contacts with healthcare provider in case of worsening symptoms (47%), whereas adherence was highest for regular medication taking (94%). Using the EHFScBS-9 standardized cut-off score ≤ 70, 51% of patients reported inadequate self-care. Binary logistic regression analysis showed significant influence of education (OR = 0.314, 95% CI: 0.103-0.959) and perceived control (OR = 1.236, 95% CI: 1.043-1.465) on self-care adequacy. According to the situation-specific theory of HF self-care, most commonly reported factors affecting the process of self-care were knowledge about HF self-care behaviours (84%), experience with healthcare professionals (84%), beliefs about their expertise (69%) and habits related to medication taking (72%). Among values, working responsibilities (53%) and maintenance of traditions (31%) appeared as the most prevalent socially based values affecting motivation for self-care. Situational characteristics related to the person (self-confidence, 53%; adaptive coping strategies, 88%), problem (burdensome breathing difficulties, 56%; co-morbidities, 81%) and environment (practical support from family/caregivers, 59%; financial difficulties, 50%) were also commonly reported.

conclusionsVarious factors, including health-related beliefs, habits and socially based values, need to be taken into account when planning self-care interventions in patients with HF. A patient tailored approach should be based on adequate patient evaluation, taking into consideration the particular personal and social context.

Indexed as

Heart FailureSelf CareAgedAged, 80 and overExerciseFemaleHumansMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedPerceptionBarriersFacilitatorsHeart failureQualitative studyQuestionnaireSelf-care behaviours

Identifiers

PMID33719209
PMCPMC8120357
OpenAlexW3139437410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.