ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2021
Two novel qualitative transcriptional signatures robustly applicable to non-research-oriented colorectal cancer samples with low-quality RNA.
Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of machine learning-based predictors for early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Comparative Multi-Omics Analysis Reveals Lignin Accumulation Affects Peanut Pod Size.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Systematic exploration of the underlying mechanism of gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Molecular oncology · 2022Article
- Comprehensive Analysis of the Oncogenic Role of Targeting Protein for Xklp2 (TPX2) in Human Malignancies.Disease markers · 2022Article
- Two novel qualitative transcriptional signatures robustly applicable to non-research-oriented colorectal cancer samples with low-quality RNA.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Currently, due to the low quality of RNA caused by degradation or low abundance, the accuracy of gene expression measurements by transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) is very challenging for non-research-oriented clinical samples, majority of which are preserved in hospitals or tissue banks worldwide with complete pathological information and follow-up data. Molecular signatures consisting of several genes are rarely applied to such samples. To utilize these resources effectively, 45 stage II non-research-oriented samples which were formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) colorectal carcinoma samples (CRC) using RNA-seq have been analysed. Our results showed that although gene expression measurements were significantly affected, most cancer features, based on the relative expression orderings (REOs) of gene pairs, were well preserved. We then developed two REO-based signatures, which consisted of 136 gene pairs for early diagnosis of CRC, and 4500 gene pairs for predicting post-surgery relapse risk of stage II and III CRC. The performance of our signatures, which included hundreds or thousands of gene pairs, was more robust for non-research-oriented clinical samples, compared to that of two published concise REO-based signatures. In conclusion, REO-based signatures with relatively more gene pairs could be robustly applied to non-research-oriented CRC samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.