Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33719032›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2021

Management of major obstetric hemorrhage prior to peripartum hysterectomy and outcomes across nine European countries.

Athanasios F Kallianidis, Alice Maraschini, Jakub Danis, Lotte B Colmorn, Catherine Deneux-Tharaux, Serena Donati, Mika Gissler, Maija Jakobsson, Marian Knight, Alexandra Kristufkova and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 9 countries.

Athanasios F KallianidisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6078-1185
Alice MaraschiniNational Center for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4754-5385
Jakub Danis1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Lotte B ColmornDepartment of Obstetrics, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Catherine Deneux-TharauxObstetric, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team, Center for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cite, Inserm U1153, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
Serena DonatiNational Center for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4607-2072
Mika GisslerInformation Services Department, THL Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Maija JakobssonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hyvinkää Hospital HUCH, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Marian KnightNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Alexandra Kristufkova1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Pelle G LindqvistClinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institute, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sodersjukhuset Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1652-8235
Griet VandenbergheDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Thomas van den AkkerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9890-9145
INOSS (the International Network of Obstetric Survey Systems)
Comenius University Bratislava · SKIstituto Superiore di Sanità · ITKarolinska Institutet · SELeiden University Medical Center · NLGhent University Hospital · BEInserm · FRRigshospitalet · DKUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeripartum hysterectomy is applied as a surgical intervention of last resort for major obstetric hemorrhage. It is performed in an emergency setting except for women with a strong suspicion of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), where it may be anticipated before cesarean section. The aim of this study was to compare management strategies in the case of obstetric hemorrhage leading to hysterectomy, between nine European countries participating in the International Network of Obstetric Survey Systems (INOSS), and to describe pooled maternal and neonatal outcomes following peripartum hysterectomy. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe merged data from nine nationwide or multi-regional obstetric surveillance studies performed in Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Slovakia, Sweden and the UK collected between 2004 and 2016. Hysterectomies performed from 22 gestational weeks up to 48 h postpartum due to obstetric hemorrhage were included. Stratifying women with and without PAS, procedures performed in the management of obstetric hemorrhage prior to hysterectomy between countries were counted and compared. Prevalence of maternal mortality, complications after hysterectomy and neonatal adverse events (stillbirth or neonatal mortality) were calculated.

resultsA total of 1302 women with peripartum hysterectomy were included. In women without PAS who had major obstetric hemorrhage leading to hysterectomy, uterotonics administration was lowest in Slovakia (48/73, 66%) and highest in Denmark (25/27, 93%), intrauterine balloon use was lowest in Slovakia (1/72, 1%) and highest in Denmark (11/27, 41%), and interventional radiology varied between 0/27 in Denmark and Slovakia to 11/59 (79%) in Belgium. In women with PAS, uterotonics administration was lowest in Finland (5/16, 31%) and highest in the UK (84/103, 82%), intrauterine balloon use varied between 0/14 in Belgium and Slovakia to 29/103 (28%) in the UK. Interventional radiology was lowest in Denmark (0/16) and highest in Finland (9/15, 60%). Maternal mortality occurred in 14/1226 (1%), the most common complications were hematologic (95/1202, 8%) and respiratory (81/1101, 7%). Adverse neonatal events were observed in 79/1259 (6%) births.

conclusionsManagement of obstetric hemorrhage in women who eventually underwent peripartum hysterectomy varied greatly between these nine European countries. This potentially life-saving procedure is associated with substantial adverse maternal and neonatal outcome.

Indexed as

AdultCesarean SectionEuropeFemaleHumansHysterectomyPeripartum PeriodPlacenta AccretaPostpartum HemorrhagePregnancyRisk FactorsUterine Rupturehysterectomyperipartum periodplacenta accretapostpartum hemorrhagepregnancy complications

Identifiers

PMID33719032
PMCPMC8360099
OpenAlexW3137786611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.