Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33719019›Full record

ReviewAAPS PharmSciTech2021

Review of Approaches for Increasing Ophthalmic Bioavailability for Eye Drop Formulations.

Olivia L Lanier, Miranda G Manfre, Claire Bailey, Zhen Liu, Zachary Sparks, Sandesh Kulkarni, Anuj Chauhan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Olivia L LanierChemical and Biological Engineering Department, Colorado School of Mines, Alderson Hall, 1613 Illinois St., Golden, Colorado, 80401, USA.
Miranda G ManfreChemical and Biological Engineering Department, Colorado School of Mines, Alderson Hall, 1613 Illinois St., Golden, Colorado, 80401, USA.
Claire BaileyChemical and Biological Engineering Department, Colorado School of Mines, Alderson Hall, 1613 Illinois St., Golden, Colorado, 80401, USA.
Zhen LiuChemical and Biological Engineering Department, Colorado School of Mines, Alderson Hall, 1613 Illinois St., Golden, Colorado, 80401, USA.
Zachary SparksChemical and Biological Engineering Department, Colorado School of Mines, Alderson Hall, 1613 Illinois St., Golden, Colorado, 80401, USA.
Sandesh KulkarniChemical and Biological Engineering Department, Colorado School of Mines, Alderson Hall, 1613 Illinois St., Golden, Colorado, 80401, USA.
Anuj ChauhanChemical and Biological Engineering Department, Colorado School of Mines, Alderson Hall, 1613 Illinois St., Golden, Colorado, 80401, USA. chauhan@mines.edu.
Colorado School of Mines · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ophthalmic diseases represent a significant problem as over 2 billion people worldwide suffer from vison impairment and blindness. Eye drops account for around 90% of ophthalmic medications but are limited in success due to poor patient compliance and low bioavailability. Low bioavailability can be attributed to short retention times in the eye caused by rapid tear turnover and the difficulty of drug diffusion through the multi-layered structure of the eye that includes lipid-rich endothelial and epithelial layers as well as the stroma which is high in water content. In addition, there are barriers such as tight junctional complexes in the corneal epithelium, lacrimal turnover, nasolacrimal drainage, blinking reflexes, efflux transporters, drug metabolism by ocular enzymes, and drug binding to or repulsion from conjunctival mucins, tear proteins, and melanin. In order to maximize transport through the cornea while minimizing drug loss through other pathways, researchers have developed numerous methods to improve eye drop formulations including the addition of viscosity enhancers, permeability enhancers, mucoadhesives, and vasoconstrictors, or using formulations that include puncta occlusion, nanocarriers, or prodrugs. This review explains the mechanism behind each of these methods, examines their history, analyzes previous and current research, evaluates future applications, and discusses the pros and cons of each technique.

Indexed as

Administration, OphthalmicAnimalsBiological AvailabilityCorneaDrug CompoundingDrug Delivery SystemsEye DiseasesHumansOphthalmic SolutionsProdrugsViscosityOphthalmic SolutionsProdrugsbioavailabilitydrug deliveryeye dropsnanoparticlespermeability enhancers

Identifiers

PMID33719019
OpenAlexW3136650439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.