Trial reportDrugs & aging2021
A Phase II, Single-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Safety and Therapeutic Efficacy of Intranasal Glulisine in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Probable Mild Alzheimer's Disease.
Trial report in Drugs & aging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02503501 (A Phase II, Single Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Safety and the Therapeutic Effectiveness of Intranasal Glulisine in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Probable Mild Alzheimer's Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase II, Single Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Safety and the Therapeutic Effectiveness of Intranasal Glulisine in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Probable Mild Alzheimer's Disease
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of antidiabetic drugs in Alzheimer´s disease: a systematic review of preclinical and clinical studies.Molecular neurodegeneration · 2025Pooled it
- [The role of antidiabetic drugs in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: systematic review].Problemy endokrinologii · 2023Pooled it
- Outcomes and clinical implications of intranasal insulin on cognition in humans: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of hypoglycemic drugs in improving cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy of intranasal insulin in improving cognition in mild cognitive impairment or dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Pooled it
- Safety and tolerability of intranasal insulin in Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Trial
- Intranasal insulin for improving cognitive function in multiple sclerosis.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025Trial
- Disease mechanisms and translational barriers guide nanocarrier design for nose to brain delivery in Alzheimer's disease.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Nanocarrier-based intranasal drug delivery for enhanced neurological disorders treatment.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Review
- MicroRNA cargo in neuron-derived vesicles as peripheral biomarkers of brain insulin dysregulation.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Intranasal insulin for the treatment of alcohol use disorder: design and methodology of an alcohol interaction randomized controlled trial.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2025Article
- Nose-to-brain drug delivery: from bench to bedside.Translational neurodegeneration · 2025Review
- Risk Factors, Pathological Changes, and Potential Treatment of Diabetes-Associated Cognitive Dysfunction.Journal of diabetes · 2025Review
- Antiageing strategy for neurodegenerative diseases: from mechanisms to clinical advances.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- Advancements in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: a comprehensive review.Dementia & neuropsychologia · 2025Review
- Intranasal insulin in Alzheimer disease (diabetesDementia & neuropsychologia · 2025Review
- Review
- Insulin Delivery to the Brain via the Nasal Route: Unraveling the Potential for Alzheimer's Disease Therapy.Drug delivery and translational research · 2024Review
- Review
- Safety and efficacy of intranasal insulin in patients with Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of clinical and translational research · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntranasal insulin is a potential treatment for neurodegenerative disease shown to increase cerebral glucose uptake, reduce amyloid plaques, and improve verbal memory in cognitively impaired as well as healthy adults. Investigations have suggested rapid-acting insulins such as glulisine may result in superior cognitive benefits compared with regular insulin.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of rapid-acting intranasal glulisine in subjects with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild probable Alzheimer's disease (AD).
methodsWe performed a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of intranasal glulisine 20 IU twice daily versus saline placebo in 35 memory-impaired (MCI/AD) subjects using the Impel NeuroPharma I109 Precision Olfactory Delivery (POD
resultsNo significant difference in ADAS-Cog13, CDR Sum of Boxes (CDR-SOB), or FAQ scores were found between treatment groups at 3 and 6 months. Subjects in the saline group were significantly older than those in the glulisine group (p = 0.022). No significant differences in sex, education, apolipoprotein E4 (ApoE4) status, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score existed between treatment groups. Overall, the number of adverse events per person was similar between groups (2.32 vs. 2.24; p = 0.824), although subjects receiving intranasal glulisine had higher rates of nasal irritation (25.0% vs. 13.9%) and respiratory symptoms (15.9% vs. 8.3%) compared with placebo. There were no differences in blood sugar or rate of hypoglycemia between the treatment and placebo groups.
conclusionsIntranasal glulisine was relatively safe and well-tolerated and did not consistently impact peripheral glucose or insulin levels. There were no enhancing effects of intranasal glulisine on cognition, function, or mood, but the ability to detect significance was limited by the number of subjects successfully enrolled and the study duration. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV REGISTRATION: NCT02503501.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.