Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33719017›Full record

Trial reportDrugs & aging2021

A Phase II, Single-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Safety and Therapeutic Efficacy of Intranasal Glulisine in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Probable Mild Alzheimer's Disease.

Michael Rosenbloom, Terry R Barclay, Bhavani Kashyap, Lyndsay Hage, Lauren R O'Keefe, Aleta Svitak, Maria Pyle, William Frey, Leah R Hanson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drugs & aging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02503501 (A Phase II, Single Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Safety and the Therapeutic Effectiveness of Intranasal Glulisine in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Probable Mild Alzheimer's Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02503501 phase2terminatednot on this map

A Phase II, Single Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Safety and the Therapeutic Effectiveness of Intranasal Glulisine in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Probable Mild Alzheimer's Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorHealthPartners InstituteRan2015 to 2019Enrolled49ConditionsMild Cognitive Impairment, Alzheimer's Disease (AD)ArmsInsulin glulisine, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Intranasal insulin for improving cognitive function in multiple sclerosis.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. MicroRNA cargo in neuron-derived vesicles as peripheral biomarkers of brain insulin dysregulation.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Nose-to-brain drug delivery: from bench to bedside.Translational neurodegeneration · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Intranasal insulin in Alzheimer disease (diabetesDementia & neuropsychologia · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael RosenbloomHealthPartners Center for Memory and Aging, 295 Phalen Boulevard, Saint Paul, MN, 55130, USA. Michael.H.Rosenbloom@HealthPartners.Com.ORCID 0000-0002-2768-9501
Terry R BarclayHealthPartners Center for Memory and Aging, 295 Phalen Boulevard, Saint Paul, MN, 55130, USA.
Bhavani KashyapHealthPartners Center for Memory and Aging, 295 Phalen Boulevard, Saint Paul, MN, 55130, USA.
Lyndsay HageHealthPartners Center for Memory and Aging, 295 Phalen Boulevard, Saint Paul, MN, 55130, USA.
Lauren R O'KeefeHealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, MN, USA.
Aleta SvitakHealthPartners Center for Memory and Aging, 295 Phalen Boulevard, Saint Paul, MN, 55130, USA.
Maria PyleHealthPartners Center for Memory and Aging, 295 Phalen Boulevard, Saint Paul, MN, 55130, USA.
William FreyHealthPartners Center for Memory and Aging, 295 Phalen Boulevard, Saint Paul, MN, 55130, USA.
Leah R HansonHealthPartners Center for Memory and Aging, 295 Phalen Boulevard, Saint Paul, MN, 55130, USA.
HealthPartners · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntranasal insulin is a potential treatment for neurodegenerative disease shown to increase cerebral glucose uptake, reduce amyloid plaques, and improve verbal memory in cognitively impaired as well as healthy adults. Investigations have suggested rapid-acting insulins such as glulisine may result in superior cognitive benefits compared with regular insulin.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of rapid-acting intranasal glulisine in subjects with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild probable Alzheimer's disease (AD).

methodsWe performed a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of intranasal glulisine 20 IU twice daily versus saline placebo in 35 memory-impaired (MCI/AD) subjects using the Impel NeuroPharma I109 Precision Olfactory Delivery (POD

resultsNo significant difference in ADAS-Cog13, CDR Sum of Boxes (CDR-SOB), or FAQ scores were found between treatment groups at 3 and 6 months. Subjects in the saline group were significantly older than those in the glulisine group (p = 0.022). No significant differences in sex, education, apolipoprotein E4 (ApoE4) status, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score existed between treatment groups. Overall, the number of adverse events per person was similar between groups (2.32 vs. 2.24; p = 0.824), although subjects receiving intranasal glulisine had higher rates of nasal irritation (25.0% vs. 13.9%) and respiratory symptoms (15.9% vs. 8.3%) compared with placebo. There were no differences in blood sugar or rate of hypoglycemia between the treatment and placebo groups.

conclusionsIntranasal glulisine was relatively safe and well-tolerated and did not consistently impact peripheral glucose or insulin levels. There were no enhancing effects of intranasal glulisine on cognition, function, or mood, but the ability to detect significance was limited by the number of subjects successfully enrolled and the study duration. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV REGISTRATION: NCT02503501.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionAdministration, IntranasalHumansInsulinMemoryNeuropsychological TestsInsulininsulin glulisine

Identifiers

PMID33719017
OpenAlexW3137380811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.