Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33718921›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2021

Effect of an emergency department education and empowerment intervention on uncontrolled hypertension in a predominately minority population: The AHEAD2 randomized clinical pilot trial.

Heather Prendergast, Marina Del Rios, Ramon Durazo-Arvizu, Sandra Escobar-Schulz, Sara Heinert, Maya Jackson, Renee Petzel Gimbar, Martha Daviglus, Brenda Lara, Shaveta Khosla

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Heather PrendergastDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago Illinois USA.
Marina Del RiosDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago Illinois USA.
Ramon Durazo-ArvizuPublic Health Sciences Loyola University Chicago Maywood Illinois USA.
Sandra Escobar-SchulzDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago Illinois USA.
Sara HeinertDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago Illinois USA.
Maya JacksonDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago Illinois USA.
Renee Petzel GimbarCollege of Pharmacy University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago Illinois USA.
Martha DaviglusInstitute for Minority Health Research University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago Illinois USA.
Brenda LaraDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago Illinois USA.
Shaveta KhoslaDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago Illinois USA.
University of Illinois Chicago · USLoyola University Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether an emergency department (ED) education and empowerment intervention coupled with early risk assessment can help improve blood pressure (BP) in a high-risk population.

methodsA hypertension emergency department intervention aimed at decreasing disparities (AHEAD2) is a 3-arm, single-site randomized pilot trial for feasibility in an urban academic ED. A total of 150 predominantly ethnic minorities with no primary care provider and severely elevated blood pressure (BP) (≥160/100 mm Hg) were enrolled over 10 months. Participants were randomized into 1 of 3 study arms: (1) enhanced usual care (EUC), (2) ED-initiated screening, brief intervention, and referral for treatment (ED-SBIRT), or (3) ED- SBIRT plus a 48-72 hours post-acute care hypertension transition clinic (ED-SBIRT+PACHT-c). Primary outcomes were change in systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP) from baseline to 9 months. Secondary outcomes were BP control (BP <140/90 mm Hg), changes in hypertension knowledge, medication adherence, and limited bedside echocardiogram (LBE) findings.

resultsSBP reduction from baseline to month 9 was -26.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -32.8, -20.7) mm Hg for ED-SBIRT, -23.4 (95% CI: -29.5, -17.3) mm Hg for ED-SBIRT+PACHT-c, and -18.9 (95% CI: -24.9, -12.9) mm Hg for EUC. DBP decreased by -12.5 (95% CI: -16.1, -9.0) mm Hg for ED-SBIRT, -11.3 (95% CI: -14.8, -7.7) mm Hg for ED-SBIRT+PACHT-c, and -8.4 (95% CI: -11.9, -4.9) mm Hg for EUC. A multicomponent intervention compared with EUC resulted in SBP decrease of -7.9 mm Hg (95% CI: -16.4, 0.6). At 9 months, hypertension was controlled for 29.3% (95% CI: 20.3, 38.3) of intervention and 23.5% (95% CI: 11.9, 35.2) of EUC participants. All groups saw improvements in hypertension knowledge, medication adherence, and LBEs, with greater improvements in intervention groups.

conclusionsThe study findings suggest that a multicomponent intervention comprising of ED education and empowerment coupled with early risk assessment may help improve BP in a high-risk population.

Indexed as

emergency departmentminoritypilot studyuncontrolled hypertension

Identifiers

PMID33718921
PMCPMC7926004
OpenAlexW3135584863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.