Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33718891›Full record

ArticleSTAR protocols2021

Eva Garcia-Alegria, Bethany Potts, Sara Menegatti, Valerie Kouskoff

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in STAR protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eva Garcia-AlegriaDevelopmental Haematopoiesis Group, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, the University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.
Bethany PottsDevelopmental Haematopoiesis Group, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, the University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.
Sara MenegattiDevelopmental Haematopoiesis Group, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, the University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.
Valerie KouskoffDevelopmental Haematopoiesis Group, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, the University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.
University of Manchester · GBAdaptimmune (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R007209/1Cancer Research UK 12486Cancer Research UK C5759/A20971Medical Research Council MR/L011840/1Medical Research Council MR/P000673/1Medical Research Council MR/T000384/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about the emergence of blood progenitors during human embryogenesis due to ethical reasons and restricted embryo access. The use of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) as a model system offers unique opportunities to dissect human blood cell formation. Here, we describe a protocol allowing the differentiation of hESCs via embryoid bodies toward hemogenic endothelium and its subsequent differentiation to blood progenitors. This protocol relies on the formation of embryoid bodies, which is tricky if not carefully performed. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Garcia-Alegria et al. (2018).

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationEmbryoid BodiesEmbryonic Stem CellsFlow CytometryHemangioblastsHematopoiesisHematopoietic Stem CellsHuman Embryonic Stem CellsHumansPluripotent Stem CellsCell cultureCell differentiationCell isolationFlow cytometry/mass cytometryStem cells

Identifiers

PMID33718891
PMCPMC7933812
OpenAlexW3133865992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.