ArticleContraception: X2021
Rural-urban residence and emergency contraception use, access, and counseling in the United States, 2006-2017.
Article in Contraception: X, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reproductive health awareness in Romania: women's knowledge, practices, and information-seeking behaviors.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2026Article
- Urban‒rural differences and determinants of utilization of sexual and reproductive health services among males in Anambra State, South-eastern Nigeria.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Sterilization, Infecundity, and Reproductive Autonomy in Rural, Suburban, and Urban America: Results From a National Survey.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2025Article
- Trends in Encounters for Emergency Contraception in US Emergency Departments, 2006-2020.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- The current status of emergency contraception use in reproductive-aged Korean women: a population-based internet survey.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
- Oral Emergency Contraception Provision in the Veterans Health Administration: a Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- Trends in Emergency Contraceptive Use Among Adolescents and Young Adults, 2006-2017.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo estimate differences in emergency contraception (EC) use, access, and counseling by rural-urban residence among reproductive age women in the United States. STUDY
designWe examined respondent data (2006-2017) from the National Survey of Family Growth for women ages 15-44 (
resultsDuring 2006 to 2017, 10% of rural and 19% of urban women who had ever had sex reported ever using EC pills. Among rural women, ever-use increased from 6% in 2006-2008 to 15% in 2015-2017 (Chi-square
conclusionWe observed differences in EC ever-use and receipt of EC counseling by rural-urban residence among US women ages 15 to 44, adding to the evidence that rural-urban residence is an important factor in reproductive health. More research is needed to explore factors contributing to rural-urban differences in EC use. IMPLICATIONS: Our key finding that EC use varied by rural-urban county residence offers additional evidence that rural-urban residence should be considered in reproductive health practice and policy. We discuss areas for future research into potential barriers to EC use in rural populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.