Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33718846›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2021

Changes to the sebum lipidome upon COVID-19 infection observed via rapid sampling from the skin.

Matt Spick, Katherine Longman, Cecile Frampas, Holly Lewis, Catia Costa, Deborah Dunn Walters, Alex Stewart, Michael Wilde, Danni Greener, George Evetts and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. No skin off your back: the sampling and extraction of sebum for metabolomics.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Matt SpickDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Katherine LongmanDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Cecile FrampasDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Holly LewisDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Catia CostaSurrey Ion Beam Centre, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Deborah Dunn WaltersFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Alex StewartFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Michael WildeUniversity of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Danni GreenerFrimley Park Hospital, Frimley Health NHS Trust, United Kingdom.
George EvettsFrimley Park Hospital, Frimley Health NHS Trust, United Kingdom.
Drupad TrivediManchester Institute of Biotechnology, University of Manchester, United Kingdom.
Perdita BarranManchester Institute of Biotechnology, University of Manchester, United Kingdom.
Andy PittManchester Institute of Biotechnology, University of Manchester, United Kingdom.
Melanie BaileyDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
University of Surrey · GBFrimley Park Hospital · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBAston University · GBUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

Parkinson's UK K-1504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has led to an unprecedented demand for testing - for diagnosis and prognosis - as well as for investigation into the impact of the disease on the host metabolism. Sebum sampling has the potential to support both needs by looking at what the virus does to us, rather than looking for the virus itself.

methodsIn this pilot study, sebum samples were collected from 67 hospitalised patients (30 COVID-19 positive and 37 COVID-19 negative) by gauze swab. Lipidomics analysis was carried out using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry, identifying 998 reproducible features. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were applied to the resulting feature set.

findingsLipid levels were depressed in COVID-19 positive participants, indicative of dyslipidemia;

interpretationCOVID-19 dysregulates many areas of metabolism; in this work we show that the skin lipidome can be added to the list. Given that samples can be provided quickly and painlessly, we conclude that sebum is worthy of future consideration for clinical sampling.

fundingThe authors acknowledge funding from the EPSRC Impact Acceleration Account for sample collection and processing, as well as EPSRC Fellowship Funding EP/R031118/1, the University of Surrey and BBSRC BB/T002212/1. Mass Spectrometry was funded under EP/P001440/1.

Indexed as

COVID-19 diagnosticsLipidomicsLiquid chromatography-mass spectrometryMulti-variate analysisSebomics

Identifiers

PMID33718846
PMCPMC7935689
OpenAlexW3134972965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.