Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33718783›Full record

ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes2021

Acute Kidney Injury After Repeated Exposure to Contrast Material for Coronary Angiography.

Aisha Betoko, Matthew B Matheson, Mohammad R Ostovaneh, Julie M Miller, Jeffrey Brinker, Christopher Cox, João A C Lima, Armin Arbab-Zadeh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aisha BetokoJohns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
Matthew B MathesonJohns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
Mohammad R OstovanehJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Julie M MillerJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Jeffrey BrinkerJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Christopher CoxJohns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
João A C LimaJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Armin Arbab-ZadehJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the incidence of contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CAAKI) after repeated exposure to contrast material for computed tomography (CT) and conventional coronary angiography within short intervals.

methodsWe studied 651 patients enrolled in the CorE-64 (November 5, 2005-January 30, 2007) and CORE320 (October 21, 2009-August 17, 2011) multicenter studies. Participants with suspected obstructive coronary heart disease were referred for diagnostic cardiac catheterization and underwent coronary CT angiography for research before invasive angiography. Nonionic, low-osmolality iodinated contrast material was used for all imaging.

resultsThe median age of the patients was 62 years, and 190 (29%) were women. Major risk factors for acute kidney injury were present in 277 of 651 (43%) patients. The median interval between CT imaging and invasive angiography was 3.1 days (interquartile range, 0.9-8.0 days). The median volume of contrast material was 100 mL for each test. In 16 (2.5%) of 651 patients, CAAKI developed. Of these cases, 1 occurred after the CT scan, whereas 6 were documented after invasive angiography (compared with post-CT creatinine concentration assessment). In 9 patients, CAAKI was found in comparing creatinine concentration after completion of both tests with baseline values (but not compared with post-CT imaging).

conclusionAcute kidney injury after repeated exposure to iodinated contrast media within a few days is uncommon even in a population of patients with highly prevalent risk factors. Withholding of clinically indicated contrast-enhanced imaging may therefore not be justified in this setting.

Indexed as

CAAKI, contrast-associated acute kidney injuryCTA, computed tomography angiographyICA, invasive coronary angiographyIQR, interquartile rangePCI, percutaneous coronary interventionSE, standard error

Identifiers

PMID33718783
PMCPMC7930798
OpenAlexW3135297546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.