ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes2021
Acute Kidney Injury After Repeated Exposure to Contrast Material for Coronary Angiography.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting computed tomography angiography-measured arteriovenous fistula anastomosis angles using intraoperative non-contrast measurements: a prospective validation study.Renal failure · 2026Article
- Review
- Multimodal Detection of Subclinical Cardiovascular Disease in Chronic Kidney Disease.Cardiorenal medicine · 2026Review
- Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Endovascular Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study from a Vascular Surgery Clinic in Eastern Europe.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Use of questionnaires in outpatients at low-risk for post-contrast acute kidney injury scheduled for intravenous iodine-based contrast media administration: a proposal for computed tomography coronary angiography.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Efficacy and safety of 128 slice CT low-dose scanning technique combined with low-density contrast agent in computed tomography angiography of diabetic foot and lower limb.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- The intellectual base and global trends in contrast-induced acute kidney injury: a bibliometric analysis.Renal failure · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the incidence of contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CAAKI) after repeated exposure to contrast material for computed tomography (CT) and conventional coronary angiography within short intervals.
methodsWe studied 651 patients enrolled in the CorE-64 (November 5, 2005-January 30, 2007) and CORE320 (October 21, 2009-August 17, 2011) multicenter studies. Participants with suspected obstructive coronary heart disease were referred for diagnostic cardiac catheterization and underwent coronary CT angiography for research before invasive angiography. Nonionic, low-osmolality iodinated contrast material was used for all imaging.
resultsThe median age of the patients was 62 years, and 190 (29%) were women. Major risk factors for acute kidney injury were present in 277 of 651 (43%) patients. The median interval between CT imaging and invasive angiography was 3.1 days (interquartile range, 0.9-8.0 days). The median volume of contrast material was 100 mL for each test. In 16 (2.5%) of 651 patients, CAAKI developed. Of these cases, 1 occurred after the CT scan, whereas 6 were documented after invasive angiography (compared with post-CT creatinine concentration assessment). In 9 patients, CAAKI was found in comparing creatinine concentration after completion of both tests with baseline values (but not compared with post-CT imaging).
conclusionAcute kidney injury after repeated exposure to iodinated contrast media within a few days is uncommon even in a population of patients with highly prevalent risk factors. Withholding of clinically indicated contrast-enhanced imaging may therefore not be justified in this setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.