ArticleACS omega2021
Preparation and Properties of a Composite Phase Change Energy Storage Gypsum Board Based on Capric Acid-Paraffin/Expanded Graphite.
Article in ACS omega, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Preparation and Pore Structure of Energy-Storage Phosphorus Building Gypsum.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Energy has become the key material basis of social development. In this work, liquid capric acid-paraffin was evenly adsorbed in the pore structure of expanded graphite (EG) by a physical adsorption method, and the new composite phase change material of capric acid-paraffin/expanded graphite (CA-P/EG) was prepared. The Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) curves of CA-P/EG composites did not change after 1000 cycles, and there was no new characteristic absorption peak, indicating that CA-P/EG composites have good chemical stability. The results showed that the optimum content of CA-P/EG in a phase change energy storage gypsum board was 20%, and the wet bending strength and compressive strength were 2.42 and 6.45 MPa, respectively. The water absorption was 16.37%, and the apparent density was 1.410 g/cm
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.