Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33718611›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development

Medical Students' Knowledge and Perception of Deep Brain Stimulation.

Brian F Saway, Sanaz Monjazeb, Kerilyn Godbe, Tessa Anwyll, Anita Kablinger, Mark Witcher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brian F SawayDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Sanaz MonjazebDepartment of Internal Medicine, St. Mary's Medical College, Long Beach, CA, USA.
Kerilyn GodbeVirginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine and Fralin Biomedical Research Institute, Roanoke, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3846-7533
Tessa AnwyllDepartment of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Anita KablingerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine and Fralin Biomedical Research Institute, Roanoke, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7131-0036
Mark WitcherDepartment of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine and Fralin Biomedical Research Institute, Roanoke, VA, USA.
Biomedical Research Institute · USMedical University of South Carolina · USVirginia Tech · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established neurosurgical procedure commonly used in movement and psychiatric disorders. Its widespread clinical implementation, however, may not be commensurate with medical education. No current assessment of medical student's understanding of DBS as a treatment option for indicated conditions is available, potentially threatening the availability of DBS to future patients. The aim of the present study is to explore the current knowledge and attitudes of medical students toward DBS as a treatment modality.

methodsA total of 65 medical students at Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine were surveyed regarding their knowledge of DBS. The survey consisted of a 25-item questionnaire including a demographic section and 3 separate inventories designed to assess bias, knowledge, and self-assessment of knowledge specific to DBS therapy. Students in pre-clinical and clinical years were analyzed separately to describe changes in knowledge or attitude associated with clinical exposure to DBS. Comparisons were analyzed using

resultsOf surveyed students, 36% were unsure of the FDA approval status of DBS treatment; 65% of students believed they had not been adequately educated about DBS and its utility; and 10.6% of students believed that DBS is likely associated with severe adverse effects and/or brain damage. The overall baseline attitudes of students toward DBS were positive. There was no observed difference between surveyed pre-clinical and clinical students, highlighting a lack of exposure throughout the clinical years of medical school education.

conclusionAlthough DBS is an effective treatment modality for various conditions, current education is non-commensurate with its application, which can negatively impact awareness and understanding for its implications by medical professionals. In order to better serve patients who may benefit from DBS, medical curricula must change to educate future physicians on the benefit of this intervention.

Indexed as

Deep brain stimulationmedical educationstudent perception

Identifiers

PMID33718611
PMCPMC7930653
OpenAlexW3134239927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.