Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33718535›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in behavioral sciences2021

Neural circuits for inference-based decision-making.

Fang Wang, Thorsten Kahnt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Reward Uncertainty and Expected Value Enhance Generalization of Episodic Memory.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fang WangDepartment of Neurology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Thorsten KahntDepartment of Neurology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

Principles of olfactory reward processing in the human brainR01DC015426 · NIDCD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI ZELANO, CHRISTINA MARIA · 2016 to 2025
$4.4M
Neural mechanisms of context-dependent stimulus generalization in humansR03DA040668 · NIDA · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI KAHNT, THORSTEN · 2016 to 2016
$227k
NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA040668NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015426
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In novel situations, where direct experience is lacking or outdated, humans must rely on mental simulations to predict future outcomes. This review discusses recent work on the neural circuits that support such inference-based behavior. We focus on two specific examples: 1) using knowledge about the associative structure of the world to infer outcomes when direct experience is lacking; 2) inferring the current value of options when the desirability of the associated outcome has changed since the original learning experience. These two examples can be studied in the sensory preconditioning and devaluation tasks, respectively. We review results from studies in animals and humans suggesting that the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), together with the hippocampus and amygdala, is necessary for inference in both of these tasks. Together, these findings suggest that the OFC is a critical hub in the brain network that supports inference-based decision-making.

Indexed as

amygdaladecision-makingdevaluation’ orbitofrontal cortexhippocampusinferencemodel-basedrewardsensory preconditioning

Identifiers

PMID33718535
PMCPMC7950311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.