ReviewVisceral medicine2021
Diagnostic Approach to Suspected Perihilar Malignancy.
Review in Visceral medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Klatskin Tumors: Challenging as Ever.Visceral medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCholangiocarcinomas are relatively rare tumors most frequently arising from the epithelium of the hilar bile ducts. The diagnosis is often made in advanced (symptomatic) stages, which accounts for the infavorable prognosis with a 5-year survival of less than 10%. Identification of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is often challenging because there is no single method offering sufficient diagnostic accuracy. SUMMARY: Most tumors arise in patients without specific risk factors. Clinical symptoms of pCCA are nonspecific and reliable biomarkers are lacking, with carbohydrate antigen 19-9 being the most commonly used tumor marker (but with a low accuracy). Cross-sectional imaging (CT and MRI) is used to identify and map hilar strictures and determine resectability by showing vascular involvement. Endoscopic ultrasound offers additional information on locoregional tumor spread and lymph node involvement. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in combination with cholangioscopy gives direct access to and imaging of hilar strictures but it does not always distinguish between pCCA and benign hilar strictures. Tissue acquisition for histological diagnosis is challenging, with frequent sampling errors regardless of the method of biopsy procurement because of the cellular paucity of tumor tissue. KEY MESSAGES: In suspected perihilar malignancy, a mosaic of clinical data has to be taken into account. Histological evaluation of (endoscopically harvested) specimens is pivotal to differential diagnosis. Several new techniques to increase diagnostic accuracy are under investigation (biomarkers and genetic testing among others).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.