Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33718331›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in chemistry2021

The Feasibility of Antioxidants Avoiding Oxidative Damages from Reactive Oxygen Species in Cryopreservation.

Xiangjian Liu, Yiming Xu, Fenglin Liu, Yuxin Pan, Lu Miao, Qubo Zhu, Songwen Tan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Recycled Sericin Biopolymer in Biotechnology and Bioelectronics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiangjian LiuXiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yiming XuSchool of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Fenglin LiuXiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yuxin PanXiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Lu MiaoXiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Qubo ZhuXiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Songwen TanXiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryopreservation prolongs the storage time of cells and plays an important role in modern biology, agriculture, plant science and medicine. During cryopreservation, cells may suffer many damages, such as osmotic dehydration, large ice puncture and oxidative damages from reactive oxygen species (ROS). Classic cryoprotectants (CPAs) are failing to dispose of ROS, while antioxidants can turn ROS into harmless materials and regulate oxidative stress. The combination of antioxidants and CPAs can improve the efficiency of cryopreservation while negative results may occur by misuse of antioxidants. This paper discussed the feasibility of antioxidants in cryopreservation.

Indexed as

antioxidantscryopreservationcryoprotectantsoxidative damagesreactive oxygen species

Identifiers

PMID33718331
PMCPMC7952315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.