ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021
A Prognostic Signature Based on Immunogenomic Profiling Offers Guidance for Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer Treatment.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A robust immune-related gene pairs signature for predicting the overall survival of esophageal cancer.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Activated Mast Cells Combined with NRF2 Predict Prognosis for Esophageal Cancer.Journal of oncology · 2023Article
- Article
- Treatments for resectable esophageal cancer: from traditional systemic therapy to immunotherapy.Chinese medical journal · 2022Review
- Review
- Development of immune gene pair-based signature predictive of prognosis and immunotherapy in esophageal cancer.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- A Novel Ferroptosis-Related Biomarker Signature to Predict Overall Survival of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our study aimed to develop an immune prognostic signature that could provide accurate guidance for the treatment of esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). By implementing Single-Sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA), we established two ESCC subtypes (Immunity High and Immunity Low) in GSE53625 based on immune-genomic profiling of twenty-nine immune signature. We verified the reliability and reproducibility of this classification in the TCGA database. Immunity High could respond optimally to immunotherapy due to higher expression of immune checkpoints, including PD1, PDL1, CTLA4, and CD80. We used WGCNA analysis to explore the underlying regulatory mechanism of the Immunity High group. We further identified differentially expressed immune-related genes (CCR5, TSPAN2) in GSE53625 and constructed an independent two-gene prognostic signature we internally validated through calibration plots. We established that high-risk ESCC patients had worse overall survival (P=0.002, HR=2.03). Besides, high-risk ESCC patients had elevated levels of infiltrating follicle-helper T cells, naïve B cells, and macrophages as well as had overexpressed levels of some immune checkpoints, including B3H7, CTLA4, CD83, OX40L, and GEM. Moreover, through analyzing the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) database, the high-risk group demonstrated drug resistance to some chemotherapy and targeted drugs such as paclitaxel, gefitinib, erlotinib, and lapatinib. Furthermore, we established a robust nomogram model to predict the clinical outcome in ESCC patients. Altogether, our proposed immune prognostic signature constitutes a clinically potential biomarker that will aid in evaluating ESCC outcomes and promote personalized treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.