Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33718122›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2020

High Grade Glioma Treatment in Elderly People: Is It Different Than in Younger Patients? Analysis of Surgical Management Guided by an Intraoperative Multimodal Approach and Its Impact on Clinical Outcome.

Giuseppe Maria Vincenzo Barbagallo, Roberto Altieri, Marco Garozzo, Massimiliano Maione, Stefania Di Gregorio, Massimiliano Visocchi, Simone Peschillo, Pasquale Dolce, Francesco Certo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Giuseppe Maria Vincenzo BarbagalloDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Policlinico "G. Rodolico" University Hospital, Catania, Italy.
Roberto AltieriDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Policlinico "G. Rodolico" University Hospital, Catania, Italy.
Marco GarozzoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Policlinico "G. Rodolico" University Hospital, Catania, Italy.
Massimiliano MaioneDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Policlinico "G. Rodolico" University Hospital, Catania, Italy.
Stefania Di GregorioDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Policlinico "G. Rodolico" University Hospital, Catania, Italy.
Massimiliano VisocchiNeurosurgical Unit, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
Simone PeschilloDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Policlinico "G. Rodolico" University Hospital, Catania, Italy.
Pasquale DolceDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Francesco CertoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Policlinico "G. Rodolico" University Hospital, Catania, Italy.
Policlinico Universitario di Catania · ITUniversity of Catania · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAge is considered a negative prognostic factor for High Grade Gliomas (HGGs) and many neurosurgeons remain skeptical about the benefits of aggressive treatment. New surgical and technological improvements may allow extended safe resection, with lower level of post-operative complications. This opportunity opens the unsolved question about the most appropriate HGG treatment in elderly patients. The aim of this study is to analyze if HGG maximal safe resection guided by an intraoperative multimodal imaging protocol coupled with neuromonitoring is associated with differences in outcome in elderly patients versus younger ones.

methodsWe reviewed 100 patients, 53 (53%) males and 47 (47%) females, with median (IQR) age of 64 (57; 72) years. Eight patients were diagnosed with Anaplastic Astrocytoma (AA), 92 with Glioblastoma (GBM). Surgery was aimed to achieve safe maximal resection. An intraoperative multimodal imaging protocol, including neuronavigation, neurophysiological monitoring, 5-ALA fluorescence,

resultsIn the first cohort division, we did not found KPS difference over time and survival analysis did not show significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.36 for OS and p = 0.49 for PFS). Same results were obtained increasing the age cut-off for age up to 70 years (p = 0.52 for OS and p = 0.92 for PFS).

conclusionsOur data demonstrate that there is not statistically significant difference in post-operative EOTR, KPS, OS, and PFS between younger and elderly patients treated with extensive tumor resection aided by a intraoperative multimodal protocol.

Indexed as

5ALAbrain tumorelderlygeriatric populationglioblastomagliomaICTIOUS

Identifiers

PMID33718122
PMCPMC7943843
OpenAlexW3129867166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.