Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33718065›Full record

ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2021

Systemic combining inflammatory score (SCIS): a new score for prediction of oncologic outcomes in patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer.

Matteo Ferro, Marina Di Mauro, Sebastiano Cimino, Giuseppe Morgia, Giuseppe Lucarelli, Abdal Rahman Abu Farhan, Mihai Dorin Vartolomei, Angelo Porreca, Francesco Cantiello, Rocco Damiano and 22 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comparison of different prediction tools for the risk of intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a propensity-matched analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Matteo FerroDivision of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Marina Di MauroUrology Section, Department of Surgery, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Sebastiano CiminoUrology Section, Department of Surgery, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Giuseppe MorgiaUrology Section, Department of Surgery, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Giuseppe LucarelliDepartment of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Abdal Rahman Abu FarhanDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Tirgu Mures, Romania.
Mihai Dorin VartolomeiDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Tirgu Mures, Romania.
Angelo PorrecaDepartment of Urology, Abano Terme Hospital, Padua, Italy.
Francesco CantielloDepartment of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Rocco DamianoDepartment of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Gian Maria BusettoDepartment of Urology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Francesco Del GiudiceDepartment of Urology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Rodolfo HurleDepartment of Urology, Istituto Clinico Humanitas Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico-Clinical and Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Sisto PerdonàUro-Gynecological Department, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Fondazione "G. Pascale" IRCCS, Naples, Italy.
Marco BorghesiDepartment of Urology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Pierluigi BoveDivision of Urology, Department of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, Urology Unit, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Riccardo AutorinoDivision of Urology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Nicolae CrisanDepartment of Urology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Michele MarchioniDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "SS. Annunziata" Hospital, Urology Unit, Chieti, Italy.
Luigi SchipsDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "SS. Annunziata" Hospital, Urology Unit, Chieti, Italy.
Francesco SoriaDivision of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy.
Andrea MariDepartment of Urology, University of Florence, Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Andrea MinerviniDepartment of Urology, University of Florence, Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Alessandro VecciaDivision of Urology, Department of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, Urology Unit, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Michele BattagliaDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Daniela TerraccianoDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Gennaro MusiDivision of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni CordimaDivision of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Matteo MutoRadiotherapy Unit, "S.G. Moscati" Hospital, Avellino, Italy.
Vincenzo MironeDepartment of Neurosciences, Sciences of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, Urology Unit, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Ottavio de CobelliDivision of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Giorgio Ivan RussoUrology Section, Department of Surgery, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
European Institute of Oncology · ITUniversity of Catania · ITMagna Graecia University · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversitatea de Medicină, Farmacie, Științe și Tehnologie „George Emil Palade” din Târgu Mureș · ROIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITIstituto Oncologico Veneto · ITPoliclinico Abano Terme · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn accurate and early diagnosis of bladder cancer (BC) is essential to offer patients the most appropriate treatment and the highest cure rate. For this reason, patients need to be best stratified by class and risk factors. We aimed to develop a score able to better predict cancer outcomes, using serum variables of inflammation.

methodsA total of 1,510 high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients were included in this retrospective observational study. Patients with pathologically proven T1 HG/G3 at first TURBT were included. Systemic combined inflammatory score (SCIS) was calculated according to systemic inflammatory markers (SIM), modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) dichotomized (final score from 0 to 3).

resultsAfter 48 months of follow-up (IQR 40.0-73.0), 727 patients recurred (48.1%), 485 progressed (32.1%), 81 died for cancer (7.0%), and 163 died for overall causes (10.8%). Overall, 231 (15.3%) patients had concomitant Cis, 669 (44.3%) patients had multifocal pathology, 967 (64.1%) patients had tumor size >3 cm. Overall, 357 (23.6%) patients received immediate-intravesical therapy, 1,356 (89.8%) received adjuvant intravesical therapy, of which 1,382 (91.5%) received BCG, 266 (17.6%) patients received mitomycin C, 4 (0.5%) patients received others intravesical therapy. Higher SCIS was independently predictive of recurrence (hazard ratio HR 1.5, 1.3 and 2.2) and cancer specific mortality for SCIS 0 and 3 (HR: 1.61 and 2.3), and overall mortality for SCIS 0 and 3 (HR: 2.4 and 3.2). Conversely, SCIS was not associated with a higher probability of progression.

conclusionsThe inclusion of the SCIS in clinical practice is simple to apply and can help improve the prediction of cancer outcomes. It can identify patients with high-grade BC who are more likely to experience disease mortality.

Indexed as

Bladder cancer (BC)immune systeminflammationoutcomesprognosis

Identifiers

PMID33718065
PMCPMC7947442
OpenAlexW3134397051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.