Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33718055›Full record

ReviewTranslational lung cancer research2021

Radiomics and artificial intelligence in lung cancer screening.

Franciszek Binczyk, Wojciech Prazuch, Paweł Bozek, Joanna Polanska

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational lung cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06579768 (Preoperative Differentiation of Jaw Cystic Lesions Based on Radiomics From Computed Tomography Images), which is not on this map. Cited by 77 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
16.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06579768 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Preoperative Differentiation of Jaw Cystic Lesions Based on Radiomics From Computed Tomography Images: A Multicenter, Prospective Machine Learning Study

TypeobservationalSponsorSun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled300ConditionsJawbone Cysitc LesionArmsdifferent types of computed tomography (CT) scans
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 152 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Lung Cancer Imaging: Screening Result and Nodule Management.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Advancements and future trends in machine learning for lung cancer: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Franciszek BinczykDepartment of Data Science and Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland.
Wojciech PrazuchDepartment of Data Science and Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland.
Paweł BozekDepartment of Radiology and Radiodiagnostics, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Joanna PolanskaDepartment of Data Science and Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland.
Silesian University of Technology · PLMedical University of Silesia · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer is responsible for more fatalities than any other cancer worldwide, with 1.76 million associated deaths reported in 2018. The key issue in the fight against this disease is the detection and diagnosis of all pulmonary nodules at an early stage. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms play a vital role in the automated detection, segmentation, and computer-aided diagnosis of malignant lesions. Among the existing algorithms, radiomics and deep-learning-based types appear to show the most promise. Radiomics is a growing field related to the extraction of a set of features from an image, which allows for automated classification of medical images into a predefined group. The process comprises a series of consecutive steps including image acquisition and pre-processing, segmentation of the desired region of interest, calculation of defined features, feature engineering, and construction of the classification model. The features calculated in this process are mainly shape features, as well as first- and higher-order texture features. To date, more than 100 features have been defined, although this number varies depending on the application. The greatest challenge in radiomics is building a cross-validated model based on a selected set of calculated features known as the radiomic signature. Numerous radiomic signatures have successfully been developed; however, reproducibility and clinical validity of the results obtained constitutes a considerable challenge of modern radiomics. Deep learning algorithms are another rapidly evolving technique and are recognized as a valuable tool in the field of medical image analysis for the detection, characterization, and assessment of lesions. Such an approach involves the design of artificial neural network architecture while upholding the goal of high classification accuracy. This paper illuminates the evolution and current state of artificial intelligence methods in lung imaging and the detection and diagnosis of pulmonary nodules, with a particular emphasis on radiomics and deep learning methods.

Indexed as

Computer-aided lung nodule detectiondeep learning for medical image analysisradiomics

Identifiers

PMID33718055
PMCPMC7947422
OpenAlexW3134678567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.