ReviewTranslational lung cancer research2021
A narrative review of invasive diagnostics and treatment of early lung cancer.
Review in Translational lung cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic value of miR-200 family in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.Biomarkers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Has computer-aided diagnosis now outperformed radiologists in the accurate localization of lung nodules?-a multicenter retrospective study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Using gene methylation detection in bronchoscopic samples combined with morphology-based pathology for lung cancer diagnosis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of 30-day unplanned readmission risk in day surgery lung cancer patients after lobectomy or sublobectomy: a real-world study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Narrative review of the application of artificial intelligence-related technologies in the diagnosis of pulmonary nodules with recommendations for clinical practice and future research.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Review
- Advancements in lung cancer: molecular insights, innovative therapies, and future prospects.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- CT-based habitat radiomics for preoperative differentiation of adenocarcinoma in situ/minimally invasive adenocarcinoma from invasive adenocarcinoma manifesting as ground-glass nodules: a multicenter study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- A clinically applicable model more suitable for predicting malignancy or benignity of pulmonary ground glass nodules in women patients.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- A 3D lung lesion variational autoencoder.Cell reports methods · 2024Article
- LIONS PREY: A New Logistic Scoring System for the Prediction of Malignant Pulmonary Nodules.Cancers · 2024Article
- A snapshot of lung cancer: where are we now?-a narrative review.Annals of translational medicine · 2023Review
- CT-guided placement of microcoil end in the pleural cavity for video-assisted thoracic surgical resection of ground-glass opacity: a retrospective study.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2022Article
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test for the measurement of deterioration and recovery of health status of patients undergoing lung surgery.Thoracic cancer · 2022Article
- Deep Learning-based Artificial Intelligence Improves Accuracy of Error-prone Lung Nodules.International journal of medical sciences · 2022Article
- Effects of miR-132-3p on progress and epithelial mesenchymal transition of non-small cell lung cancer via regulating KLF7.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnosis and treatment of early-stage lung cancer remains a clinical challenge. The broadening implementation of lung cancer screening has resulted in positive findings in numerous patients that are mostly non-malignant. Many other patients have indeterminate nodules that are difficult to assess through simple observation. The critical interpretation of such screening results remains a challenge for radiologists and multidisciplinary teams involved in screening for lung cancer. The evaluation and diagnosis of each participant suspected for malignancy should be based on the basic clinical principles such as a carefully collected medical history, physical examination, and detailed analysis of all imaging tests performed. Indeed, the decision to go ahead with more invasive diagnostics requires consideration of the both the risks and benefits, with reflection upon the complete clinical and radiological picture. Although transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy remains the first-choice method of diagnosis, several newer technologies have slowly begun to emerge as potential replacements. The guiding strategy for method selection is to choose the least harmful approach that offers the most relevant potential insights. Transthoracic biopsy is an effective method that allows the collection of cytological and tissue material from small, peripheral tumors, but it carries a moderate risk of complications. Bronchofiberoscopy, especially in combination with electromagnetic navigation, fluoroscopy or radial EBUS, also allows effective diagnosis of the peripheral pulmonary nodules. One of the most important diagnostic methods is the EBUS examination, which allows determining of staging in addition to diagnosis. Anatomical lung lobe resection and lymphadenectomy or sampling of the hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes is currently the treatment of choice for patients with stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but sublobar resections are recommended when a patient has limited pulmonary function or other significant comorbidities. Notably, several studies have highlighted the potential utility of more limited resections in small malignant lesions less than 2cm in diameter, with pure AIS histology, when more than 50% of the diameter of pulmonary nodule has ground-glass opacity (GGO) attenuation on CT, or long volume doubling time (VDT). Videothoracoscopy is the preferred surgical approach for resection of early-stage lung cancer. Patients who are not candidates for surgery or do not agree to surgery can be offered radical radiotherapy. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a type of radical radiotherapy with proven effectiveness, a high rate of local control and an acceptable risk of the development of later complications. Future trials are expected to define the role of SBRT in the treatment of early lung cancer in healthy subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.