Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33718008›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia research. Cognition2021

The difference of social cognitive and neurocognitive performance between patients with schizophrenia at different stages and influencing factors.

Shengyun Chen, Yaxi Liu, Dennis Liu, Guican Zhang, Xiaoli Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia research. Cognition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shengyun ChenPsychiatry Department, The 3rd Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yaxi LiuPsychiatry Department, The 3rd Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Dennis LiuNorthern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Guican ZhangPsychiatry Department, The 3rd Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaoli WuPsychiatry Department, The 3rd Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNThird Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University · CNUniversity of Adelaide · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectsTo explore the specific features of cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia at different stages and its influencing factors.

methodsThe MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) were administered to 208 patients with schizophrenia, including 158 clinically stable schizophrenia (CSS) and 50 first-episode patients with schizophrenia (FES), and 40 healthy controls (HC). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match the CSS and FES.

results(1) The MCCB and it

conclusionsThere are significant cognitive deficits in patients with FES and CSS compared with HC. FES have greater cognitive impairments compared with CSS. Emotion intelligence of CSS may be even close to the level of HC. BPRS total score, gender, group (FES vs CSS) and age may be the independent contributors to social cognition. Group (FES vs CSS) may play an important effect on general cognition and social cognition.

Indexed as

Influencing factorsMCCBNeurocognitionSchizophreniaSocial cognition

Identifiers

PMID33718008
PMCPMC7933534
OpenAlexW3135797083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.