Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33718000›Full record

ArticleToxicology reports2021

A screening approach for the evaluation of tobacco-free 'modern oral' nicotine products using Real Time Cell Analysis.

N East, E Bishop, D Breheny, M Gaca, D Thorne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Using Pod Based e-Cigarettes and Nicotine Pouches to Reduce Harm for Adults With Low Socioeconomic Status Who Smoke: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. The Potential Impact of Oral Nicotine Pouches on Public Health: A Scoping Review.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in toxicology · 2024
    Article
  10. AnCurrent research in toxicology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Emerging Oral Nicotine Products and Periodontal Diseases.International journal of dentistry · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Bridging: Accelerating Regulatory Acceptance of Reduced-Risk Tobacco and Nicotine Products.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Review
  17. Toxicology reports · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

N EastBritish American Tobacco, R&D, Southampton, Hampshire, SO15 8TL, UK.
E BishopBritish American Tobacco, R&D, Southampton, Hampshire, SO15 8TL, UK.
D BrehenyBritish American Tobacco, R&D, Southampton, Hampshire, SO15 8TL, UK.
M GacaBritish American Tobacco, R&D, Southampton, Hampshire, SO15 8TL, UK.
D ThorneBritish American Tobacco, R&D, Southampton, Hampshire, SO15 8TL, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many regulated industries there is an increasing pressure to provide timely and robust risk assessment data to support product launches. Real-time cell analysis (RTCA) is a tool that allows for the fast and relatively labour-free cytotoxic assessment of test compounds, compared to traditional methods. Here, we propose an application for the RTCA platform to provide a screening approach, to evaluate the cytotoxic potential of tobacco-free nicotine pouches, also termed modern oral product (MOP), to determine the contribution of differing nicotine strengths (4-11 mg) and a range of available flavour types from multiple markets, on overall product toxicity. Aqueous extracts were prepared for all products using 1 pouch in 20 mL cell culture media and applied to the cell system for 24 h. Test extract nicotine concentrations reflected the increases in product nicotine strength; however, these changes were not present in the same magnitude in the cytotoxicity data obtained from both primary human gingival fibroblasts (HGF) and an NCI-H292 human bronchial epithelial continuous cell line. Furthermore, across the range of flavours and product nicotine strengths tested, H292 cells whilst not the target organ for oral product use, accurately predicted the results seen in HGFs and could be considered a useful surrogate for fast screening studies. H292 cells are more easily cultured and for longer periods, offering a more compatible test system. In conclusion, the data demonstrate the utility of the RTCA platform for the quick assessment of a large range of product variants. Furthermore, for a cytotoxicity measure with this test product, the simple H292 cell line can predict outcomes in the more complex HGF and provide useful pre-clinical cytotoxicity screening data to inform the risk assessment of MOPs and the relative contribution of flavourings, nicotine and other components.

Indexed as

AqE, Aqueous extractCRP, 1.1 CORESTA Reference Product 1.1CytotoxicityH292, Human bronchial epithelial cellsHGF, Human gingival fibroblastsIn vitroLDH, Lactate dehydrogenase assayMOP, Modern oral productMTT, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromideNicotineNRU, Neutral red uptake assayRisk assessmentRTCARTCA, Real Time Cell AnalysisTobacco-free modern oral tobaccoTobacco-free nicotine pouches

Identifiers

PMID33718000
PMCPMC7933807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.