ArticleToxicology reports2021
A screening approach for the evaluation of tobacco-free 'modern oral' nicotine products using Real Time Cell Analysis.
Article in Toxicology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of high-nicotine oral products shows potential to reduce tobacco-related harm by offering satisfying alternatives.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Using Pod Based e-Cigarettes and Nicotine Pouches to Reduce Harm for Adults With Low Socioeconomic Status Who Smoke: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024Trial
- Research on the safety risk of oral nicotine products and its prospects.Current research in toxicology · 2026Review
- A comprehensive review on oral nicotine pouches: Available scientific evidence and future research needs.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2025Review
- The Potential Impact of Oral Nicotine Pouches on Public Health: A Scoping Review.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025Article
- Comparative evaluation of artificial saliva and complete artificial saliva as solvent vehicles forFrontiers in toxicology · 2025Article
- Investigating oral nicotine pouch use among adults in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: prevalence, awareness, susceptibility, and associated symptoms.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Tobacco-Free Nicotine Pouches and Their Potential Contribution to Tobacco Harm Reduction: A Scoping Review.Cureus · 2024Article
- Article
- AnCurrent research in toxicology · 2024Article
- Oral nicotine pouches with an aftertaste? Part 2: in vitro toxicity in human gingival fibroblasts.Archives of toxicology · 2023Article
- Article
- Emerging Oral Nicotine Products and Periodontal Diseases.International journal of dentistry · 2023Review
- Article
- Biomarkers of Exposure and Potential Harm in Exclusive Users of Nicotine Pouches and Current, Former, and Never Smokers: Protocol for a Cross-sectional Clinical Study.JMIR research protocols · 2022Article
- Bridging: Accelerating Regulatory Acceptance of Reduced-Risk Tobacco and Nicotine Products.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In many regulated industries there is an increasing pressure to provide timely and robust risk assessment data to support product launches. Real-time cell analysis (RTCA) is a tool that allows for the fast and relatively labour-free cytotoxic assessment of test compounds, compared to traditional methods. Here, we propose an application for the RTCA platform to provide a screening approach, to evaluate the cytotoxic potential of tobacco-free nicotine pouches, also termed modern oral product (MOP), to determine the contribution of differing nicotine strengths (4-11 mg) and a range of available flavour types from multiple markets, on overall product toxicity. Aqueous extracts were prepared for all products using 1 pouch in 20 mL cell culture media and applied to the cell system for 24 h. Test extract nicotine concentrations reflected the increases in product nicotine strength; however, these changes were not present in the same magnitude in the cytotoxicity data obtained from both primary human gingival fibroblasts (HGF) and an NCI-H292 human bronchial epithelial continuous cell line. Furthermore, across the range of flavours and product nicotine strengths tested, H292 cells whilst not the target organ for oral product use, accurately predicted the results seen in HGFs and could be considered a useful surrogate for fast screening studies. H292 cells are more easily cultured and for longer periods, offering a more compatible test system. In conclusion, the data demonstrate the utility of the RTCA platform for the quick assessment of a large range of product variants. Furthermore, for a cytotoxicity measure with this test product, the simple H292 cell line can predict outcomes in the more complex HGF and provide useful pre-clinical cytotoxicity screening data to inform the risk assessment of MOPs and the relative contribution of flavourings, nicotine and other components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.