Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33717975›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2021

Core decompression with bone marrow aspirate concentrate in post collapse avascular necrosis of hip: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Karan Jindal, Sameer Aggarwal, Prasoon Kumar, Pratik Rathod

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karan JindalDepartment of Orthopaedics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Sameer AggarwalDepartment of Orthopaedics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Prasoon KumarDepartment of Orthopaedics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Pratik RathodDepartment of Orthopaedics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAvascular necrosis (AVN) of femoral head is commonly seen in middle age groups and in its advanced stages, it is a common indication for total hip replacements (THRs). These patients invariably require revision surgeries in their lifetime and modalities to delay the first arthroplasty are necessary. Core decompression (CD) with bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) have proved successful in early stages of AVN, but their role in advanced stages remains unclear. The present review was done to assess the same. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is CD and BMAC combination effective in delaying radiographic progression and THRs in post collapse stages of AVN hip? METHODOLOGY: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine the overall efficacy of CD and BMAC in post collapse stages of AVN hip and to specifically compare primary outcomes like radiographic progression along with need of THR, with CD alone.Three data bases (PubMed, EMBASE and SCOPUS) were searched to identify relevant articles.

resultsThe present review included 12 studies with 3 studies included in the meta-analysis. There were 270 hips across the 12 studies out of which 196 hips were treated with CD + BMAC. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: 39.8% cases worsened from stage 3 to stage 4, while the overall incidence of THR in stages 3 and 4 was 38.3%. On comparison with CD alone the combination of CD + BMAC did not show any enhanced efficacy in either delaying progression (Odds ratio of 1.41 (95% CI = 0.55-3.62) or in conversion to THR (Odds Ratio: 0. 92; 95% CI = 0.41-2.06).

conclusionCD can be considered in stage 3 of AVN in younger population to delay the need of arthroplasty, before severe head distortion and arthritis sets in, and can be supplemented with bone strut grafts or tantalum rods, for supporting the articular cartilage. BMAC that has shown better results in early AVN, has not shown any additional benefits when compared to CD alone in advanced cases.

Indexed as

Advanced AVNAvascular necrosisBone marrow aspirate concentratecore decompressionStem cellsSubchondral collapse

Identifiers

PMID33717975
PMCPMC7919970
OpenAlexW3133308025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.