Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33717930›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2021

Comparison of local pain and tissue reaction between conventional pneumatic tourniquet and disposable silicone ring tourniquet during Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Sanjay Bhalchandra Londhe, Ravi Vinod Shah, Shubhankar Sanjay Londhe, Pritesh Omprakash Agrawal, Nicholas A Antao, Sushil Churhe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sanjay Bhalchandra LondheConsultant Orthopedic Surgeon, Criticare Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Ravi Vinod ShahConsultant Orthopedic Surgeon, Criticare Hospital, India.
Shubhankar Sanjay LondheComputer Science Student, MIT College of Engineering, Pune, India.
Pritesh Omprakash AgrawalConsultant Orthopaedic Surgeon, Mehsana, Gujarat, India.
Nicholas A AntaoConsultant Orthopaedic Surgeon, Holy Spirit Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Sushil ChurheOrthopedic Resident Holy Spirit Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Holy Spirit Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo study the comparison of conventional pneumatic and disposable silicone ring tourniquet in Total Knee Arthroplasty. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis is a prospective randomized control trial. We used conventional pneumatic tourniquet on one side of leg and disposable silicone ring tourniquet on the other side in consecutive 50 simultaneous bilateral TKR patients. Patients having peripheral vascular disease of the lower limb were excluded from the study. The patient demographics & characteristics are identical being the same patient with two different legs. We started the study with null hypothesis. An independent observer assessed the local tourniquet site pain (VAS score 1-10) and local tourniquet site skin reaction at 24 h and 48 h after the TKA. P value < 0.05 was considered significant.

resultsThere were no local skin complication with disposable tourniquet (0%). 8 out of 50 patients in whom the conventional tourniquet was applied showed local bruising, and two patients had blister formation making the local skin site complication rate 20% (statistically significant, p value0.0196, chi-squared test). The VAS score at 24 h was 4.3 ± 1.5 for disposable tourniquet group as against 5.6 ± 2.1 for conventional tourniquet group (statistically significant, p value = 0.0152, t statistic test for comparison of means). The VAS score at 48 h was 2.1 ± 1.5 and 3.3 ± 1.2 for disposable tourniquet group and conventional tourniquet group respectively (statistically significant p value = 0.003, student's t-test).

conclusionUse of disposable tourniquet has better outcome than the conventional tourniquet with minimal or no local complications. The advantages of the disposable tourniquet are: 1 less local pain, 2. no local skin problems, 3. accurate tourniquet pressure at the application site, 4.0% local contamination. Hence, we recommend use of the disposable tourniquet during the Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Indexed as

Conventional tourniquetDisposable tourniquetTotal Knee Arthroplasty, TKATotal knee replacementVisual Analog Score, VAS

Identifiers

PMID33717930
PMCPMC7919981
OpenAlexW3084438861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.