Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33717903›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2021

Analysis of mechanical variables in Hoffa fracture - A comparison of four methods by finite elements.

Anderson Freitas, Rubén Jeri Aquino, Felipe Fagundes de Brito, Vinicius Mendes Bonfim, Joubert Vieira Toledo Júnior, Walter Rodrigo Daher

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Hoffa fractures are slower to heal than entire condyle fractures of the distal femur: an analysis of type 33B fractures.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anderson FreitasRegional Hospital of the City of Gama, Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Rubén Jeri AquinoRegional Hospital of the City of Gama, Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Felipe Fagundes de BritoRegional Hospital of the City of Gama, Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Vinicius Mendes BonfimRegional Hospital of the City of Gama, Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Joubert Vieira Toledo JúniorRegional Hospital of the City of Gama, Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Walter Rodrigo DaherRegional Hospital of the City of Gama, Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Hospital de Base · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCorrect management of Hoffa fractures is a challenge in the clinical context. Open reduction along with internal fixation should be the therapy of choice. Mechanical trials with the main internal fixation systems conducted by individualized finite element (FEM) models, to date, have been neglected. The aim of this study was to biomechanically analyze four fixation methods for the treatment of Type II Hoffa fracture (OTA Classification: 33B3.2∗ lateral) using FEM.

methodsFour internal fixators were developed to treat Type II Hoffa fracture using finite elements: 4.5 mm cortical screws and 7 mm cannulated screw in anterior-to-posterior and posterior-to-anterior directions (4.5AP, 4.5 PA, 7AP and 7 PA). Under the same conditions, fractural deviation in the vertical, maximum and minimum principal and Von Mises directions in the syntheses used were evaluated.

resultsThe vertical displacements evaluated were 0.7 mm, 0.5 mm, 0.8 mm and 0.3 mm; the values of maximum were 6.14 Mpa, 6.15 hPa, 6.0 Mpa and 6.2 Mpa, the values obtained from minimum data were 6.26 Mpa, -6.45 Mpa, -7.3 MPa and -6.8 Mpa and the maximum values of Von Mises peak stress were 185.0 Mpa, 194.1 Mpa, 143.6 Mpa and 741.4 Mpa, for the fixation models 4.5AP, 4.5 PA, 7AP and 7 PA, respectively.

conclusionThe 7 mm-cannulated screw fixation system yielded the best mechanical results evaluated by FEM in the treatment of Type II Hoffa fracture, causing a decrease in vertical displacement when used in retrograde and in Von Mises peak stress in anterograde.

Indexed as

BiomechanicsFinite element analysisHoffa fractureInternal fixationScrew

Identifiers

PMID33717903
PMCPMC7919976
OpenAlexW3046902666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.