Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33717846›Full record

ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2021

Tackling Photonic Inverse Design with Machine Learning.

Zhaocheng Liu, Dayu Zhu, Lakshmi Raju, Wenshan Cai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Physics-Informed Inverse Design of Programmable Metasurfaces.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhaocheng LiuSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta GA 30332 USA.
Dayu ZhuSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta GA 30332 USA.
Lakshmi RajuSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta GA 30332 USA.
Wenshan CaiSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta GA 30332 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6367-3857

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning, as a study of algorithms that automate prediction and decision-making based on complex data, has become one of the most effective tools in the study of artificial intelligence. In recent years, scientific communities have been gradually merging data-driven approaches with research, enabling dramatic progress in revealing underlying mechanisms, predicting essential properties, and discovering unconventional phenomena. It is becoming an indispensable tool in the fields of, for instance, quantum physics, organic chemistry, and medical imaging. Very recently, machine learning has been adopted in the research of photonics and optics as an alternative approach to address the inverse design problem. In this report, the fast advances of machine-learning-enabled photonic design strategies in the past few years are summarized. In particular, deep learning methods, a subset of machine learning algorithms, dealing with intractable high degrees-of-freedom structure design are focused upon.

Indexed as

inverse designmachine learningnanophotonicsneural networks

Identifiers

PMID33717846
PMCPMC7927633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.