Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33717594›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2021

Machine learning models for predicting critical illness risk in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

Qin Liu, Baoguo Pang, Haijun Li, Bin Zhang, Yumei Liu, Lihua Lai, Wenjun Le, Jianyu Li, Tingting Xia, Xiaoxian Zhang and 8 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. LHSPred: A web based application for predicting lung health severity.Biomedical signal processing and control · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Qin LiuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Baoguo PangDepartment of Radiology, Huangpi District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China.
Haijun LiDepartment of Radiology, Hankou Hospital of Wuhan, Wuhan, China.
Bin ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Yumei LiuDepartment of Respiratory, Hankou Hospital of Wuhan, Wuhan, China.
Lihua LaiDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Wenjun LeDepartment of Respiratory, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, China.
Jianyu LiDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Tingting XiaDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaoxian ZhangPulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Changxing OuPulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jianjuan MaDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
Shenghao LiDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiumei GuoDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Shuixing ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Qingling ZhangPulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Min JiangDepartment of Pediatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Qingsi ZengDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Guangzhou Medical University · CNWuhan Hankou Hospital · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University · CNState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease · CNGuangxi Medical University · CNGuangxi University of Science and Technology · CNGuiyang Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo develop machine learning classifiers at admission for predicting which patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who will progress to critical illness.

methodsA total of 158 patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 admitted to three designated hospitals between December 31, 2019 and March 31, 2020 were retrospectively collected. 27 clinical and laboratory variables of COVID-19 patients were collected from the medical records. A total of 201 quantitative CT features of COVID-19 pneumonia were extracted by using an artificial intelligence software. The critically ill cases were defined according to the COVID-19 guidelines. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression was used to select the predictors of critical illness from clinical and radiological features, respectively. Accordingly, we developed clinical and radiological models using the following machine learning classifiers, including naive bayes (NB), linear regression (LR), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), kernel support vector machine (k-SVM), and back propagation neural networks (BPNN). The combined model incorporating the selected clinical and radiological factors was also developed using the eight above-mentioned classifiers. The predictive efficiency of the models is validated using a 5-fold cross-validation method. The performance of the models was compared by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

resultsThe mean age of all patients was 58.9±13.9 years and 89 (56.3%) were males. 35 (22.2%) patients deteriorated to critical illness. After LASSO analysis, four clinical features including lymphocyte percentage, lactic dehydrogenase, neutrophil count, and D-dimer and four quantitative CT features were selected. The XGBoost-based clinical model yielded the highest AUC of 0.960 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.913-1.000)]. The XGBoost-based radiological model achieved an AUC of 0.890 (95% CI: 0.757-1.000). However, the predictive efficacy of XGBoost-based combined model was very close to that of the XGBoost-based clinical model, with an AUC of 0.955 (95% CI: 0.906-1.000).

conclusionsA XGBoost-based based clinical model on admission might be used as an effective tool to identify patients at high risk of critical illness.

Indexed as

chest CTCOVID-19critical illnessmachine learningprediction

Identifiers

PMID33717594
PMCPMC7947498
OpenAlexW3130086192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.