ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2021
Uniportal approach as an alternative to the three-portal approach to video-assisted thoracic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical efficacy and safety of different video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery approaches for bullous lung resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Evaluation of the safety of drainless uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for the treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a two-institution retrospective study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Uniportal thoracoscopic bullectomy with improved parietal pleurectomy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax.The clinical respiratory journal · 2023Article
- A retrospective multi-institutional survey of characteristics of surgically treated spontaneous hemopneumothorax patients.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn recent years, uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (U-VATS) has been used for primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP). This study compared the perioperative outcomes of U-VATS and three-port VATS (3P-VATS) and sought to determine the risk factors for postoperative recurrence.
methodsFrom October 2010 to February 2017, 232 patients with PSP undergoing surgical treatment were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into two groups: U-VATS (n=161) and 3P-VATS (n=71) depending on the period of surgery. Retrospective analysis of the perioperative results and the risk factors for recurrence was performed.
resultsBoth the operation time and duration of postoperative drainage were initially longer in the U-VATS group, but the difference gradually decreased such that ultimately there was no significant difference compared to the 3P-VATS group (P=0.10 and P=0.12, respectively). The duration of postoperative hospital stay and postoperative recurrence rate were not different between the two groups (P=0.084 and P=0.44, respectively). By multivariate analysis, the age (HR, 0.42, 95% CI: 0.24-0.72, P<0.01) and number of bullae (single vs. multiple: HR, 0.03, 95% CI: 0.002-0.54, P=0.02) were risk factors for recurrence.
conclusionsThe perioperative results and recurrence rate did not differ between the U-VATS and 3P-VATS groups, thereby demonstrating the non-inferiority of U-VATS. Postoperative risk factors for PSP recurrence were patient age and the number of bullae. Additional treatment may be needed to reduce recurrence in young patients with multiple bullae. Clinical registration number: The Institutional Review Board of Maebashi Red Cross Hospital (no. 2019-21).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.