Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33717484›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2021

Association between the handgrip strength and the isokinetic muscle function of the elbow and the knee in asymptomatic adults.

Thatiane Lopes Valentim Di Paschoale Ostolin, Bárbara de Barros Gonze, Wesley de Oliveira Vieira, André Luiz Silva de Oliveira, Matheus Bibian Nascimento, Rodolfo Leite Arantes, Marcello Romiti, Evandro Fornias Sperandio, Victor Zuniga Dourado

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thatiane Lopes Valentim Di Paschoale OstolinLaboratory of Epidemiology and Human Movement, Federal University of São Paulo, Santos, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8492-2840
Bárbara de Barros GonzeLaboratory of Epidemiology and Human Movement, Federal University of São Paulo, Santos, Brazil.
Wesley de Oliveira VieiraLaboratory of Epidemiology and Human Movement, Federal University of São Paulo, Santos, Brazil.
André Luiz Silva de OliveiraLaboratory of Epidemiology and Human Movement, Federal University of São Paulo, Santos, Brazil.
Matheus Bibian NascimentoLaboratory of Epidemiology and Human Movement, Federal University of São Paulo, Santos, Brazil.
Rodolfo Leite ArantesInstitute of Cardiovascular Medicine Angiocorpore, Santos, Brazil.
Marcello RomitiInstitute of Cardiovascular Medicine Angiocorpore, Santos, Brazil.
Evandro Fornias SperandioLaboratory of Epidemiology and Human Movement, Federal University of São Paulo, Santos, Brazil.
Victor Zuniga DouradoLaboratory of Epidemiology and Human Movement, Federal University of São Paulo, Santos, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe handgrip strength is a practical, valid, reliable, low-cost tool that presents strong correlations with several health conditions. However, handgrip strength may be inaccurate to prospectively predict the variability of muscular function since the decrease in muscular strength over the years varies according to a muscular group or between upper and lower limbs. Our hypothesis is that the handgrip strength cannot explain the variance of muscle function prospectively. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cross-sectional and prospective association between handgrip strength and isokinetic muscle function of the knee and elbow in 780 asymptomatic adults.

methodsIn a sample of 780 adults, we obtained handgrip strength and elbow and knee muscle function (for both flexion and extension at 60°/s and 300°/s) using, respectively, a hydraulic dynamometer and an isokinetic dynamometer. In a cross-sectional analysis, we analyzed the data obtained from baseline assessment. Then, we calculated the absolute change as a result of the variation data between the baseline and the 1-year follow-up assessment of each participant. The correlations were analyzed using Pearson or Spearman coefficients. We used multivariate models to investigate the association between handgrip strength and isokinetic muscle function. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The cross-sectional correlations were significantly moderate-to-strong (

conclusionThe 1-year absolute change of the handgrip strength cannot explain the variance of the isokinetic muscle function. Thus, specific measures are required for assessing muscle function in epidemiological studies.

Indexed as

cohort analysisHand strengthmuscle functionmuscle strength dynamometer

Identifiers

PMID33717484
PMCPMC7924002
OpenAlexW3134449162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.