Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33717355›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2021

Monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 infection in mustelids.

European Food Safety Authority and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Anette Boklund, Christian Gortázar, Paolo Pasquali, Helen Roberts, Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Karl Stahl, Arjan Stegeman, Francesca Baldinelli, Alessandro Broglia and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Natural SARS-CoV-2 infection in farmed minksFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A comparison of sampling and testing approaches for the surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in farmed American mink.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Avian influenza overview December 2022 - March 2023.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Hands off the Mink! Using Environmental Sampling for SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance in American Mink.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. SARS-CoV-2 Monitoring on Mink Farms in Poland.Journal of veterinary research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

European Food Safety Authority and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control
Anette Boklund
Christian Gortázar
Paolo Pasquali
Helen Roberts
Søren Saxmose Nielsen
Karl Stahl
Arjan Stegeman
Francesca Baldinelli
Alessandro Broglia
Yves Van Der Stede
Cornelia Adlhoch
Erik Alm
Angeliki Melidou
Grazina Mirinaviciute
Animal Welfare Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

American mink and ferret are highly susceptible to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), but no information is available for other mustelid species. SARS-CoV-2 spreads very efficiently within mink farms once introduced, by direct and indirect contact, high within-farm animal density increases the chance for transmission. Between-farm spread is likely to occur once SARS-CoV-2 is introduced, short distance between SARS-CoV-2 positive farms is a risk factor. As of 29 January 2021, SARS-CoV-2 virus has been reported in 400 mink farms in eight countries in the European Union. In most cases, the likely introduction of SARS-CoV-2 infection into farms was infected humans. Human health can be at risk by mink-related variant viruses, which can establish circulation in the community, but so far these have not shown to be more transmissible or causing more severe impact compared with other circulating SARS-CoV-2. Concerning animal health risk posed by SARS-CoV-2 infection the animal species that may be included in monitoring plans are American mink, ferrets, cats, raccoon dogs, white-tailed deer and Rhinolophidae bats. All mink farms should be considered at risk of infection; therefore, the monitoring objective should be early detection. This includes passive monitoring (in place in the whole territory of all countries where animals susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 are bred) but also active monitoring by regular testing. First, frequent testing of farm personnel and all people in contact with the animals is recommended. Furthermore randomly selected animals (dead or sick animals should be included) should be tested using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), ideally at weekly intervals (i.e. design prevalence approximately 5% in each epidemiological unit, to be assessed case by case). Suspected animals (dead or with clinical signs and a minimum five animals) should be tested for confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Positive samples from each farm should be sequenced to monitor virus evolution and results publicly shared.

Indexed as

early detectionepidemicsminkmonitoringmustelidSARS‐CoV‐2

Identifiers

PMID33717355
PMCPMC7926496
OpenAlexW3135265863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.