Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33717289›Full record

ArticleAsian bioethics review2018

The "Use" of Sex Robots: A Bioethical Issue.

Elen C Carvalho Nascimento, Eugênio da Silva, Rodrigo Siqueira-Batista

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian bioethics review, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Sex Doll Ownership: An Agenda for Research.Current psychiatry reports · 2020
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elen C Carvalho NascimentoBioethics, Applied Ethics and Public Health (PPGBIOS), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Eugênio da SilvaPontifical Catholic University, UNIFESO, UEZO, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rodrigo Siqueira-BatistaBioethics, Applied Ethics and Public Health (PPGBIOS), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The manufacture of humanoid robots with embedded artificial intelligence and for sexual purposes has generated some debates within bioethics, in which diverse competing views have been presented. Themes such as sexuality and its deviations, the objectification of women, the relational problems of contemporary life, loneliness, and even the reproductive future of the species constitute the arguments which have emerged in relation to this subject. Based on these themes, this article presents the current state of the use of female sex robots, the bioethical problems that arise, and how bioethics could serve as a medium for both thinking about and resolving some of these challenges.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceGenderObjectificationRobotsSex robotsSexuality

Identifiers

PMID33717289
PMCPMC7747268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.