Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33716996›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2021

Human Microbiota and Breast Cancer-Is There Any Relevant Link?-A Literature Review and New Horizons Toward Personalised Medicine.

Diogo Alpuim Costa, José Guilherme Nobre, Marta Vaz Batista, Catarina Ribeiro, Catarina Calle, Alfonso Cortes, Maximilian Marhold, Ida Negreiros, Paula Borralho, Miguel Brito and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Tumor-colonizingmBio · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Diogo Alpuim CostaBreast Cancer Unit, CUF Oncologia, Lisbon, Portugal.
José Guilherme NobreFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Marta Vaz BatistaMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Prof. Doutor Fernando Fonseca, Amadora, Portugal.
Catarina RibeiroFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Catarina CalleFaculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.
Alfonso CortesMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón Y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Maximilian MarholdDivision of Oncology, Department for Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ida NegreirosBreast Cancer Unit, CUF Oncologia, Lisbon, Portugal.
Paula BorralhoBreast Cancer Unit, CUF Oncologia, Lisbon, Portugal.
Miguel BritoHealth and Technology Research Center (H&TRC), Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Javier CortesInternational Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Quiron Group, Barcelona, Spain.
Sofia Azambuja BragaBreast Cancer Unit, CUF Oncologia, Lisbon, Portugal.
Luís CostaBreast Cancer Unit, CUF Oncologia, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy and the second cause of cancer-specific death in women from high-income countries. Recently, gut microbiota dysbiosis emerged as a key player that may directly and/or indirectly influence development, treatment, and prognosis of BC through diverse biological processes: host cell proliferation and death, immune system function, chronic inflammation, oncogenic signalling, hormonal and detoxification pathways. Gut colonisation occurs during the prenatal period and is later diversified over distinct phases throughout life. In newly diagnosed postmenopausal BC patients, an altered faecal microbiota composition has been observed compared with healthy controls. Particularly, β-glucuronidase bacteria seem to modulate the enterohepatic circulation of oestrogens and their resorption, increasing the risk of hormone-dependent BC. Moreover, active phytoestrogens, short-chain fatty acids, lithocholic acid, and cadaverine have been identified as bacterial metabolites influencing the risk and prognosis of BC. As in gut, links are also being made with local microbiota of tumoural and healthy breast tissues. In breast microbiota, different microbial signatures have been reported, with distinct patterns per stage and biological subtype. Total bacterial DNA load was lower in tumour tissue and advanced-stage BC when compared with healthy tissue and early stage BC, respectively. Hypothetically, these findings reflect local dysbiosis, potentially creating an environment that favours breast tumour carcinogenesis (oncogenic trigger), or the natural selection of microorganisms adapted to a specific microenvironment. In this review, we discuss the origin, composition, and dynamic evolution of human microbiota, the links between gut/breast microbiota and BC, and explore the potential implications of metabolomics and pharmacomicrobiomics that might impact BC development and treatment choices toward a more personalised medicine. Finally, we put in perspective the potential limitations and biases regarding the current microbiota research and provide new horizons for stronger accurate translational and clinical studies that are needed to better elucidate the complex network of interactions between host, microorganisms, and drugs in the field of BC.

Indexed as

breast cancerdysbiosismetabolomicsmicrobiomemicrobiotapersonalized medicinepharmacomicrobiomicsreview

Identifiers

PMID33716996
PMCPMC7947609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.