ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021
A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Employment Returns to Education and Health Status in China: Moderating Role of Gender.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Association Between Job-Seeking & Adult Attention Deficient Hyperactivity Disorder Among Working-Age Individuals in Oman: A Retrospective Study from the National Clinical Service for Adult ADHD in Oman.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- How Do R&D and Renewable Energy Consumption Lead to Carbon Neutrality? Evidence from G-7 Economies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Health, Education, and Economic Well-Being in China: How Do Human Capital and Social Interaction Influence Economic Returns.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Health Risk, Income Effect, and the Stability of Farmers' Poverty Alleviation in Deep Poverty Areas: A Case Study of S-County in Qinba Mountain Area.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Development trend of primary healthcare after health reform in China: a longitudinal observational study.BMJ open · 2022Observational
- Exchange Relationships and Helping Behavior: An Empirical Analysis of Data from CGSS2015.Psychology research and behavior management · 2022Article
- Nursing Interns' Attitudes Toward, Preferences for, and Use of Diabetes Virtual Simulation Teaching Applications in China: National Web-Based Survey.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Based on the nationally representative sample data from the Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS-2015), this study examines the relationship of education levels and health status with an individual's probability of being employed in China. The findings obtained from the binary logistic regression estimator suggest that people with a higher level of education were more likely to be employed than those who have less or no education. The individual with university or above education was found to be 85% more likely to be employed than college or equal diploma holders. Further, the healthier individual was found to be 11% more likely to be employed than relatively less healthy. Moreover, the resulting coefficients obtained from the moderation effect suggest that all of the two-way interaction effects among health status and education levels with gender are not statistically significant even at the 10% level. The results suggest that there was no multiplicative effect of gender with health status and level of education on an individual's probability of being employed. Further, the study also suggests important policy implications in the light of China's active labor force market and the gender gap in employment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.