Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33716859›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021

Neuronal Effects of Listening to Entrainment Music Versus Preferred Music in Patients With Chronic Cancer Pain as Measured via EEG and LORETA Imaging.

Andrea McGraw Hunt, Jörg Fachner, Rachel Clark-Vetri, Robert B Raffa, Carrie Rupnow-Kidd, Clemens Maidhof, Cheryl Dileo

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Andrea McGraw HuntDepartment of Music, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ, United States.
Jörg FachnerCambridge Institute for Music Therapy Research, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Rachel Clark-VetriDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Robert B RaffaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Carrie Rupnow-KiddSouth Woods State Prison, Rutgers University Behavioral Health Care, Bridgeton, NJ, United States.
Clemens MaidhofCambridge Institute for Music Therapy Research, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Cheryl DileoDepartment of Music Education and Therapy, Boyer College of Music and Dance, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
IMC University of Applied Sciences Krems · ATTemple University · USRowan University · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies examining EEG and LORETA in patients with chronic pain discovered an overactivation of high theta (6-9 Hz) and low beta (12-16 Hz) power in central regions. MEG studies with healthy subjects correlating evoked nociception ratings and source localization described delta and gamma changes according to two music interventions. Using similar music conditions with chronic pain patients, we examined EEG in response to two different music interventions for pain. To study this process in-depth we conducted a mixed-methods case study approach, based on three clinical cases. Effectiveness of personalized music therapy improvisations (entrainment music - EM) versus preferred music on chronic pain was examined with 16 participants. Three patients were randomly selected for follow-up EEG sessions three months post-intervention, where they listened to recordings of the music from the interventions provided during the research. To test the difference of EM versus preferred music, recordings were presented in a block design: silence, their own composed EM (depicting both "pain" and "healing"), preferred (commercially available) music, and a non-participant's EM as a control. Participants rated their pain before and after the EEG on a 1-10 scale. We conducted a detailed single case analysis to compare all conditions, as well as a group comparison of entrainment-healing condition versus preferred music condition. Power spectrum and according LORETA distributions focused on expected changes in delta, theta, beta, and gamma frequencies, particularly in sensory-motor and central regions. Intentional moment-by-moment attention on the sounds/music rather than on pain and decreased awareness of pain was experienced from one participant. Corresponding EEG analysis showed accompanying power changes in sensory-motor regions and LORETA projection pointed to insula-related changes during entrainment-pain music. LORETA also indicated involvement of visual-spatial, motor, and language/music improvisation processing in response to his personalized EM which may reflect active recollection of creating the EM. Group-wide analysis showed common brain responses to personalized entrainment-healing music in theta and low beta range in right pre- and post-central gyrus. We observed somatosensory changes consistent with processing pain during entrainment-healing music that were not seen during preferred music. These results may depict top-down neural processes associated with active coping for pain.

Indexed as

cancercase studychronic painEEGLORETA (Low Resolution Electromagnetic Tomography)music therapypain

Identifiers

PMID33716859
PMCPMC7947245
OpenAlexW3135872286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.