Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33716787›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in physiology2021

Efficacy of Whole-Body Electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) on Body Composition and Muscle Strength in Non-athletic Adults. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Wolfgang Kemmler, Mahdieh Shojaa, James Steele, Joshua Berger, Michael Fröhlich, Daniel Schoene, Simon von Stengel, Heinz Kleinöder, Matthias Kohl

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05672264 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Whole-body Electromyostimulation for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis (EMSOAT) in Overweight People - a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical SchoolRan2022 to 2024Enrolled72ConditionsOsteoarthritis, KneeArmsWhole-Body Electromyostimulation, Physiotherapy
NCT07375823 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Electrical Muscle Stimulation Applied Concurrently With Active Movement and Exercise Therapy in Cervical Radiculopathy: A Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorEuropean University of LefkeRan2025 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsCervical Radiculopathy, Cervical Radicular Pain, Neck Pain, NumbnessArmsExercise Therapy, Superimposition of electrical muscle stimulation on active movement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wolfgang KemmlerInstitute of Medical Physics, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Mahdieh ShojaaInstitute of Medical Physics, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
James SteeleUkactive Research Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Joshua BergerDepartment of Sports Science, Technische Universität Kaiserslauter, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Michael FröhlichDepartment of Sports Science, Technische Universität Kaiserslauter, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Daniel SchoeneInstitute of Medical Physics, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Simon von StengelInstitute of Medical Physics, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Heinz KleinöderGerman Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Matthias KohlFaculty Medical and Life Sciences, University of Furtwangen, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis set out to determine the efficacy on whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) on body composition and strength parameters in non-athletic cohorts. A systematic review of the literature according to the PRISMA statement included (a) controlled trials, (b) WB-EMS trials with at least one exercise and one control group, (c) WB-EMS as primary physical intervention, (d) WB-EMS with at least six electrodes covering most muscle groups, (e) non-athletic cohorts. We searched eight electronic databases up to June 30, 2020, without language restrictions. Standardized mean differences (SMD) for muscle mass parameters, total body fat mass, maximum leg extension, and trunk extension strength were defined as outcome measures. In summary, 16 studies with 19 individual WB-EMS groups representing 897 participants were included. Studies vary considerably with respect to age, BMI, and physical conditions. Impulse protocols of the studies were roughly comparable, but training frequency (1-5 sessions/week) and intervention length (6-54 weeks) differed between the studies. SMD average was 1.23 (95%-CI: 0.71-1.76) for muscle mass, 0.98 (0.74-1.22) for maximum leg, and 1.08 (0.78-1.39) for maximum trunk extension strength changes (all

Indexed as

body compositionbody fat massexerciselean body massmuscle strengthwhole-body electromyostimulation

Identifiers

PMID33716787
PMCPMC7952886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.