Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33716705›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in synaptic neuroscience2021

Voltage-Gated Ca

Nadine J Ortner

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nanoscale CabioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Selective CaStem cell reports · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Disease-modifying, multidimensional efficacy of putaminal CaMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  6. Update: Protective and risk factors for Parkinson disease.Parkinsonism & related disorders · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. CaBritish journal of pharmacology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nadine J OrtnerDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Institute of Pharmacy, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Universität Innsbruck · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 27809
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The loss of dopamine (DA)-producing neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SN) underlies the core motor symptoms of the progressive movement disorder Parkinson's disease (PD). To date, no treatment to prevent or slow SN DA neurodegeneration exists; thus, the identification of the underlying factors contributing to the high vulnerability of these neurons represents the basis for the development of novel therapies. Disrupted Ca

Indexed as

Ca2+ channel blockersCa2+ oscillationsL-type Ca2+ channelsParkinson's diseaseR-type Ca2+ channelsT-type Ca2+ channelsvoltage-gated Ca2+ channels

Identifiers

PMID33716705
PMCPMC7952618
OpenAlexW3135673958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.