Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33716573›Full record

ArticleSocial theory & health : STH2022

Forbidding your cake and eating it too: health performance strategies in U.S. middle class families.

Laurel Graham, Jennifer Friedman, Xamil Vega

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social theory & health : STH, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laurel GrahamDepartment of Sociology, University of South Florida, 4202 E Fowler Ave. CPR 107, Tampa, FL 33620 USA.
Jennifer FriedmanDepartment of Sociology, University of South Florida, 4202 E Fowler Ave. CPR 107, Tampa, FL 33620 USA.
Xamil VegaKnight's College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, 6850 Lake Nona Blvd, Orlando, FL 32827 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interviewing 67 primarily middle-class parents and children in a southern U.S. city, we learned that families know a great deal about the dangers of excess sugar consumption. However, in the private spaces of family life, families let down their guard and enjoy sugary treats, often treating them as symbolic markers of love and comfort. Theoretical concepts emerging from the dramaturgical perspective of Erving Goffman (1959) and from contemporary symbolic interactionists illuminate how sugar consumption is simultaneously shunned and celebrated in private family life. Moving beyond previous research, we track the ways sugary products facilitate love, sanity, and privacy to make daily family life bearable for both parents and children. We call the rhetorical and physical practices that enable excusable sugar indulgence

Indexed as

ChildrenConsumer cultureFamilyGoffmanInteractionSugar

Identifiers

PMID33716573
PMCPMC7938281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.