ArticleActa Cardiologica Sinica2021
Does Employing a Flowchart Improve the Diagnostic Performance of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Left Ventricular Noncompaction?
Article in Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo test the hypothesis that making a diagnosis of left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) using a noncompacted-to-compacted (NC/C) myocardium ratio > 2.3 would yield significant errors, and also to test a diagnostic flowchart in patients who undergo CMRI and have clinical and echocardiographic findings suggesting LVNC could improve the diagnosis of LVNC.
methodsA total of 84 patients with LVNC and 162 controls consisting of patients with other diseases and healthy participants who had CMRI and echocardiograms were selected. The diagnostic flowchart of the study involved the use of CMRI with all available sequences for patients with a high pre-test probability of LVNC. Two blinded independent cardiologists evaluated echocardiograms, and patients with suggestive echocardiographic and clinical findings for LVNC were enrolled in the high pre-test probability of LVNC group. Two independent blinded radiologists established the diagnosis of LVNC based on NC/C ratio > 2.3 on CMRI, and they were allowed to re-assess the patients following the diagnostic flowchart.
resultsAn NC/C ratio > 2.3 identified 83 of 84 LVNC patients, yet incorrectly classified 48 of the 162 controls as having LVNC. Radiologists changed their decision in 23 of 48 patients with incorrect diagnoses, resulted in improved specificity (70.4% to 84.6%). The use of the CMRI diagnostic flowchart in the high pre-test probability group yielded a high specificity (97.2%) and accuracy (95.9%).
conclusionsLVNC diagnosed by CMRI based on the NC/C criterion can lead to overdiagnosis, whereas only using CMRI in patients with a high pre-test probability of LVNC with all available sequences may improve the diagnostic performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.