Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33716444›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2021

Comparative outcome of anaesthetic for elderly hip fracture.

Vipul Garg, Hayley Lawrence, Yogesh Joshi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vipul GargWrexham Maelor hospital, Wrexham, UK.
Hayley LawrenceWrexham Maelor hospital, Wrexham, UK.
Yogesh JoshiWrexham Maelor hospital, Wrexham, UK.
Wrexham Maelor Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCurrent guidelines recommend offering patients both options of a spinal or general anaesthetic. At local level we attempt to ensure whether similar outcome is reflected in our practice regarding difference between General anaesthesia(GA) and Spinal Anaesthesia(SA) in morbidity and mortality.

methodsData from spreadsheet maintained for NHFD was used to identify patients with Neck of Femur Fracture in 2018.Mortality data was retrieved from the Welsh Clinical Portal. Data was organised according to the type of anaesthetic received. Outcome measures for Morbidity (length of stay in hospital) and Mortality (at both 30 days and 120 days) following surgery, were then inputted for these patients. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software. A Mann Whitney

resultsWe reviewed 203 patients elderly hip fracture with mean age of 83 (range 60-99), there were 142 Female and 61 males.4 patients were treated non operatively, and 2 patients had no data available 0.146 patient received GA and 46 received spinal anaesthesia. Hemiarthroplasty and DHS are commonest procedure in both groups. On applying Mann Whitney

conclusionIn summary, this audit remains in line with current literature, that there is not a significant difference between the length of stay, survival at 30 days and at 120 days between the two different groups.

Indexed as

General anaesthesiaMorbidityMortalityNeck of femur fractureSpinal anaesthesia

Identifiers

PMID33716444
PMCPMC7920336
OpenAlexW3034225736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.