Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33716359›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2020

IPAD: Stable Interpretable Forecasting with Knockoffs Inference.

Yingying Fan, Jinchi Lv, Mahrad Sharifvaghefi, Yoshimasa Uematsu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Robust FDR Control for Neuroimaging-based Classification via Knockoffs.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Null-free False Discovery Rate Control Using Decoy Permutations.Acta mathematicae applicatae Sinica (English series) · 2022
    Article
  9. Asymptotic Theory of Eigenvectors for Random Matrices with Diverging Spikes.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2022
    Article
  10. DeepLINK: Deep learning inference using knockoffs with applications to genomics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yingying FanUniversity of Southern California.
Jinchi LvUniversity of Southern California.
Mahrad SharifvaghefiUniversity of Southern California.
Yoshimasa UematsuTohoku University.

Funding

Adaptive Reproducible High-Dimensional Nonlinear Inference for Big Biological DataR01GM131407 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI FAN, YINGYING · 2018 to 2021
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM131407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interpretability and stability are two important features that are desired in many contemporary big data applications arising in statistics, economics, and finance. While the former is enjoyed to some extent by many existing forecasting approaches, the latter in the sense of controlling the fraction of wrongly discovered features which can enhance greatly the interpretability is still largely underdeveloped. To this end, in this paper we exploit the general framework of model-X knockoffs introduced recently in Candès, Fan, Janson and Lv (2018), which is nonconventional for reproducible large-scale inference in that the framework is completely free of the use of p-values for significance testing, and suggest a new method of intertwined probabilistic factors decoupling (IPAD) for stable interpretable forecasting with knockoffs inference in high-dimensional models. The recipe of the method is constructing the knockoff variables by assuming a latent factor model that is exploited widely in economics and finance for the association structure of covariates. Our method and work are distinct from the existing literature in that we estimate the covariate distribution from data instead of assuming that it is known when constructing the knockoff variables, our procedure does not require any sample splitting, we provide theoretical justifications on the asymptotic false discovery rate control, and the theory for the power analysis is also established. Several simulation examples and the real data analysis further demonstrate that the newly suggested method has appealing finite-sample performance with desired interpretability and stability compared to some popularly used forecasting methods.

Indexed as

Large-scale inference and FDRLatent factorsModel-X knockoffsPowerReproducibilityStability

Identifiers

PMID33716359
PMCPMC7954402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.