Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33716076›Full record

ReviewNeuropharmacology2021

Social vulnerabilities for substance use: Stressors, socially toxic environments, and discrimination and racism.

Hortensia Amaro, Mariana Sanchez, Tara Bautista, Robynn Cox

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 141 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
141citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

141 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

81 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hortensia AmaroHerbert Wertheim College of Medicine and Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, United States. Electronic address: hamaro@fiu.edu.
Mariana SanchezDepartment of Health Promotion & Disease Prevention, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, United States. Electronic address: msanche@fiu.edu.
Tara BautistaYale Stress Center, School of Medicine, Yale University, United States. Electronic address: tara.bautista@yale.edu.
Robynn CoxSuzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, And Edward R. Roybal Institute on Aging, University of Southern California, United States. Electronic address: robynnco@usc.edu.

Funding

Florida International University-Health Disparities Initiative (FIU-HDI)S21MD010683 · NIMHD · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI Mario R De La Rosa, ANDRES G GIL · 2016 to 2026
$17.5M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR001864 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CANTLEY, LLOYD G, EDELMAN, E. JENNIFER · 2016 to 2025
$9.9M
Interdisciplinary Research Training Institute on Hispanic Drug AbuseR25DA026401 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI VALDEZ, AVELARDO · 2009 to 2019
$3.2M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001864NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA026401NIMHD NIH HHS S21 MD010683
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Applying a social determinants of health framework, this review brings attention to evidence from social sciences and neuroscience on the role of selected social factors in individual and population-level vulnerability to substance use and substance use disorders (SUDs). The understanding that social vulnerability to substance use and SUDs is multifaceted and occurs across different levels of influence (individual, interpersonal, community, and societal) is underscored. We propose that socially based stressors play a critical role in creating vulnerability to substance use and SUDs, and as such, deserve greater empirical attention to further understand how they "get under the skin." Current knowledge from social sciences and neuroscience on the relationships among vulnerability to substance use resulting from stressors, exposure to socially toxic childhood environments, and racism and discrimination are summarized and discussed, as are implications for future research, practice, and policy. Specifically, we propose using a top-down approach to the examination of known, yet often unexplored, relationships between vulnerability to substance use and SUDs, related inequities, and potential differential effects across demographic groups. Finally, research gaps and promising areas of research, practice, and policy focused on ameliorating social vulnerabilities associated with substance use and SUDs across the lifespan are presented. This article is part of the special issue on 'Vulnerabilities to Substance Abuse'.

Indexed as

RacismSocial EnvironmentStress, PsychologicalSubstance-Related DisordersChildHumansDiscriminationRacismSocially toxic environmentsSocial vulnerabilitiesStressorsSubstance use

Identifiers

PMID33716076
PMCPMC8126433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.